פרק כד
Chapter 24: The Opposite of a Mitzvah: Sin, and the Soul in Exile
Chapter 23 showed that a mitzvah unites a person with G‑d. Here is the opposite: every sin, even a light one, is at that moment total separation from G‑d’s oneness, lower even than the kelipah of idolatry, which never defies its Master. Sins differ only afterwards, in the damage they leave, and all along the G‑dly soul stays faithful, in exile.
1.The other side of the mitzvah
וְזֶה לְעֻמַּת זֶה הֵן שְׁסָ"ה מִצְוֹת לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה דְּאוֹרַיְתָא וְכָל אִסּוּרֵי דְּרַבָּנָן, מֵאַחַר שֶׁהֵן נֶגֶד רְצוֹנוֹ וְחָכְמָתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ וְהֶפְכָּם מַמָּשׁ, הֵם נִפְרָדִים מִיִּחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ בְּתַכְלִית הַפֵּרוּד מַמָּשׁ, כְּמוֹ הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וְהַקְּלִפָּה הַנִּקְרָאִים עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה וֵאלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים, מֵחֲמַת הֶסְתֵּר פָּנִים שֶׁל רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל.
“The one set against the other”: this refers to the Torah’s 365 prohibitions and to every rabbinic prohibition. Because they run counter to the Blessed One’s will and wisdom, being their direct opposite, they are cut off completely from His unity and oneness. They belong with the sitra achra and the kelipah termed “idolatry” (avodah zarah) and “alien gods”, on account of the concealment of the Supreme Will’s Face, as described earlier.
Chapter 23 showed that a mitzvah, G‑d’s inner will, unites a person with Him. Its opposite is the prohibition. A forbidden act is not neutral but the very opposite of G‑d’s will, and so it is total separation from His oneness, like the kelipah called “idolatry”, which (chapter 22) gets life only from the “back” of the Divine will and so feels itself a thing apart from G‑d. As with the mitzvah, the chapter looks first at the deed, then at the person who does it.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #63 (ch. 24a) — 23:18, 23:55, 28:12, 29:40, 29:57, 30:16, 30:45
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 1 — 19:12, 19:37
2.The whole person joins the kelipah
וְכֵן שְׁלֹשָׁה לְבוּשֵׁי הַנֶּפֶשׁ שֶׁמִּקְּלִפַּת נֹגַהּ שֶׁבְּיִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁהֵם מַחֲשָׁבָה דִּבּוּר וּמַעֲשֶׂה הַמְּלֻבָּשִׁים בִּשְׁסָ"ה לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה דְּאוֹרַיְתָא וּדְרַבָּנָן. וְכֵן מַהוּת הַנֶּפֶשׁ עַצְמָהּ הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בִּלְבוּשֶׁיהָ, כֻּלָּם מְיֻחָדִים מַמָּשׁ בְּסִטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפָּה זוֹ, הַנִּקְרֵאת עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה.
The same applies to a Jew’s soul that derives from kelipas nogah and its three garments: thought, speech and deed. When these garments are invested in any of the Torah’s 365 prohibitions or in a rabbinic prohibition, they, together with the soul itself that wears them, become fully joined to that sitra achra and kelipah termed “idolatry”.
Now the person. The animal soul acts through three “garments”, thought, speech and action. When a person thinks, says or does something forbidden, the garment is “clothed” in the prohibition, and so is the soul acting through it. At that moment the whole person is joined to the kelipah of idolatry. This is the animal soul; the G‑dly soul comes at the end of the chapter.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #63 (ch. 24a) — 41:00, 41:15, 42:00, 42:39, 50:43, 50:50
3.Why the kelipah never rebels
וְלֹא עוֹד, אֶלָּא שֶׁבְּטֵלִים וּטְפֵלִים אֵלֶיהָ, וּגְרוּעִים וּפְחוּתִים מִמֶּנָּה מְאֹד. כִּי הִיא אֵינָהּ מְלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּגוּף חָמְרִי, וְיוֹדַעַת אֶת רִבּוֹנָהּ, וְאֵינָהּ מוֹרֶדֶת בּוֹ לִפְעֹל פְּעֻלָּתָהּ בְּמִשְׁלַחַת מַלְאֲכֵי רָעִים שֶׁלָּהּ שֶׁלֹּא בִּשְׁלִיחוּתוֹ שֶׁל מָקוֹם בָּרוּךְ הוּא חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, וּכְמַאֲמַר בִּלְעָם: "לֹא אוּכַל לַעֲבֹר אֶת פִּי ה'" וגו'.
וְאַף שֶׁנִּקְרָא עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, הָא קָרוּ לֵהּ אֱלָהָא דֵּאלָהַיָּא, וְאֵינָם יְכוֹלִים לַעֲבֹר כְּלָל עַל רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, כִּי יוֹדְעִים וּמַשִּׂיגִים שֶׁהוּא חִיּוּתָם וְקִיּוּמָם, שֶׁיּוֹנְקִים מִבְּחִינַת אֲחוֹרַיִם דַּאֲחוֹרַיִם שֶׁל רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן בָּרוּךְ הוּא הַמַּקִּיף עֲלֵיהֶם. אֶלָּא שֶׁיְּנִיקָתָם וְחִיּוּתָם שֶׁבְּתוֹכָם הִיא בִּבְחִינַת גָּלוּת בְּתוֹכָם, לְהַחְשִׁיב עַצְמָן אֱלֹהוּת, וַהֲרֵי זוֹ כְּפִירָה בְּאַחְדּוּתוֹ.
אֲבָל מִכָּל מָקוֹם אֵינָן כּוֹפְרִים וְכִחֲשׁוּ בַּה' לְגַמְרֵי וְלוֹמַר לֹא הוּא, אֶלָּא דְּקָרוּ לֵהּ אֱלָהָא דֵּאלָהַיָּא, דְּהַיְנוּ חִיּוּתָם וְקִיּוּמָם הַנִּמְשָׁךְ וְיוֹרֵד עֲלֵיהֶם מֵרְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ. וְלָכֵן אֵינָן עוֹבְרִין רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ לְעוֹלָם.
Indeed, they become subservient to it, sinking far beneath it in lowliness and baseness. For the kelipah, which wears no physical body, is aware of its Creator. It never defies Him by carrying out its task, dispatching its harmful agents, unless the Omnipresent, blessed be He, has sent it, heaven forbid. So Bilaam declared: “I am unable to transgress G‑d’s word…”
And though it bears the name “idolatry”, its powers refer to Him as “the G‑d above all gods”. Opposing His will is impossible for them, since they are aware that their life and being come from Him: they are fed from the outermost, “back of the back” level of the Supreme Will, which surrounds them. The only flaw is that this nourishment and vitality is exiled within them, so that they regard themselves as gods, and this amounts to denying His oneness.
Even so, they never reject G‑d outright by declaring “He does not exist”. They name Him “the G‑d above all gods”, acknowledging that their life and being descend to them from His will. That is why they never act against it.
The surprise: the sinner is beneath the kelipah. The kelipah has no physical body to screen it, so it stands more exposed to the Divine light. It thinks of itself as a “god” only because the life inside it is hidden, in exile; still, it knows it has a Master, and even its harmful work is done on G‑d’s mission. Bilaam said so: even for a house full of silver and gold he could not go beyond G‑d’s word.
That is “the G‑d of gods”: “I am something too, but my life comes from Him.” The kelipah denies His oneness, but not His mastery, so it never disobeys.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #63 (ch. 24a) — 45:16, 45:36, 45:51, 46:41, 47:04, 47:14, 47:19, 48:10, 48:49, 55:06, 55:30
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 1 — 19:54, 20:10, 25:58, 26:36, 27:59, 28:13, 29:38
4.Lower than the kelipah itself
וְאִם כֵּן, הָאָדָם הָעוֹבֵר עַל רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ הוּא גָּרוּעַ וּפָחוּת הַרְבֵּה מְאֹד מֵהַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפָּה הַנִּקְרֵאת עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה וֵאלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים. וְהוּא בְּתַכְלִית הַפֵּרוּד מִיִּחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ שֶׁל הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא יוֹתֵר מִמֶּנָּה, וּכְאִלּוּ כּוֹפֵר בְּאַחְדּוּתוֹ יוֹתֵר מִמֶּנָּה חַס וְשָׁלוֹם.
וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בְּעֵץ חַיִּים שַׁעַר מ"ב סוֹף פרק ד', שֶׁהָרַע שֶׁבָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה הַחָמְרִי הוּא שִׁמְרֵי הַקְּלִפּוֹת הַגַּסּוֹת כו' וְהוּא תַּכְלִית הַבֵּרוּר וכו', וְלָכֵן כָּל מַעֲשֵׂה עוֹלָם הַזֶּה קָשִׁים וְרָעִים וְהָרְשָׁעִים גּוֹבְרִים בּוֹ וכו'.
If so, the person who goes against His will, blessed be He, is much, much lower and baser than the sitra achra and kelipah called “idolatry” and “other gods”. He is more utterly separated than it from the unity and oneness of the Holy One, blessed be He, and it is as though he denies His oneness more than it does, G‑d forbid.
So it is written in Etz Chaim (Gate 42, close of chapter 4): the evil of this material world is the sediment of the gross kelipos…, the last stage of the refining process…; and so every matter in this world is hard and bad, and the wicked hold sway in it…
The sinner, at that moment, says in effect, “What You want does not decide what I do.” He moves the final word from G‑d to himself, a deeper separation than the kelipah ever reaches. He is lower than the kelipah of idolatry itself. Notice “as though”: he does not think he is denying G‑d. The point is what the act says.
Etz Chaim explains why this can happen here. Our physical world holds the dregs left after the refining of the kelipos. Here the concealment is thickest, so only here can a creature defy G‑d’s will.
5.A spirit of folly
וְלָכֵן אָמְרוּ רַזַ"ל עַל פָּסוּק "כִּי תִשְׂטֶה אִשְׁתּוֹ", "אֵין אָדָם עוֹבֵר עֲבֵרָה" וכו', דַאֲפִלּוּ אִשָּׁה הַמְּנָאֶפֶת, שֶׁדַּעְתָּהּ קַלָּה, הָיְתָה מוֹשֶׁלֶת בְּרוּחַ תַּאֲוָתָהּ, לוּלֵי רוּחַ שְׁטוּת שֶׁבָּהּ הַמְּכַסֶּה וּמַסְתִּיר וּמַעְלִים אֶת הָאַהֲבָה מְסֻתֶּרֶת שֶׁבְּנַפְשָׁהּ הָאֱלֹהִית, לְדָבְקָה בֶּאֱמוּנַת ה' וְיִחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ, וְלֹא לִפָּרֵד חַס וְשָׁלוֹם מֵאַחְדּוּתוֹ אֲפִלּוּ נוֹטְלִים אֶת נַפְשָׁהּ מִמֶּנָּה לַעֲבֹד עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, וַאֲפִלּוּ בְּהִשְׁתַּחֲוָאָה לְבַדָּהּ, בְּלִי שׁוּם אֱמוּנָה בַּלֵּב כְּלָל. וְכָל שֶׁכֵּן לִכְבֹּשׁ הַיֵּצֶר וְתַאֲוַת הַנִּאוּף, שֶׁהֵם יִסּוּרִים קַלִּים מִמִּיתָה, ה' יִשְׁמְרֵנוּ.
וְהַהֶפְרֵשׁ שֶׁאֶצְלָהּ בֵּין אִסּוּר נִאוּף לְאִסּוּר הִשְׁתַּחֲוָאָה לַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה הוּא גַּם כֵּן רוּחַ שְׁטוּת דִּקְלִפָּה, הַמַּלְבֶּשֶׁת לַנֶּפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית עַד בְּחִינַת חָכְמָה שֶׁבָּהּ וְלֹא עַד בִּכְלָל, מִפְּנֵי אוֹר ה' הַמְּלֻבָּשׁ בְּחָכְמָה כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל.
That is why our Sages commented on the verse “Should a man’s wife go astray (tisteh)”: “No one sins [unless a spirit of folly (shtus) has come into him].” Even a woman who strays, frivolous as she is, would have overcome the pull of her passion were it not for that spirit of folly. It veils and masks the hidden love of her G‑dly soul, which yearns to hold fast to belief in G‑d, His unity and oneness, and never to be parted from His oneness, heaven forbid, even if it cost her life to refuse to serve an idol, heaven forbid, even by a mere bow with no inner belief at all. How much more, then, would she overcome her urge and her lust for adultery, since that is a far smaller pain than dying, may G‑d spare us.
Her treating adultery differently from bowing to an idol is itself a spirit of folly from the kelipah. That spirit reaches the G‑dly soul up to its chochmah, but not into chochmah itself, because the light of G‑d rests in chochmah, as chapter 19 explained.
The Sages link tisteh, “goes astray”, to shtus, “folly”. The same person who would die rather than bow to an idol gives in to a desire that would cost far less to resist. Her hidden love for G‑d (chapters 18–19) can face death, so the strength is there. What is missing is the feeling that this act, too, cuts her off from G‑d. And “I still believe in my heart” is no answer: that excuse is open to one ordered to bow, yet a Jew dies rather than do an act of separation from G‑d.
The kelipah can cover every level of the G‑dly soul except chochmah, where G‑d’s light rests and faith lives. Idolatry touches faith itself, so chochmah wakes up. With other sins it stays asleep, and a person still feels like a good Jew. That feeling is the folly. It explains the sin; it does not excuse it.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #64 (ch. 24b) — 25:42, 26:55, 27:21, 29:02, 29:30, 30:28, 31:22, 32:07, 32:46, 41:01, 41:29, 41:40, 42:58, 43:32, 44:13, 44:24, 44:55
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 1 — 42:09, 43:51, 48:12, 48:32, 49:00, 52:00
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 2 — 03:02, 03:54, 04:06
6.Even a light sin: “the gnat came before you”
אֲבָל בֶּאֱמֶת לַאֲמִתּוֹ, אֲפִלּוּ עֲבֵרָה קַלָּה, הֲרֵי הָעוֹבְרָהּ עוֹבֵר עַל רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן בָּרוּךְ הוּא, וְהוּא בְּתַכְלִית הַפֵּרוּד מִיִּחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, יוֹתֵר מִסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפָּה הַנִּקְרָאִים אֱלֹהִים אֲחֵרִים וַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה מַמָּשׁ, וְיוֹתֵר מִכָּל הַדְּבָרִים הַנִּשְׁפָּעִים מִמֶּנָּה בָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה, שֶׁהֵם בְּהֵמוֹת טְמֵאוֹת וְחַיּוֹת וְעוֹפוֹת טְמֵאִים וּשְׁקָצִים וּרְמָשִׂים, וְכַמַּאֲמָר "יַתּוּשׁ קְדָמְךָ". פֵּרוּשׁ, דְּאַף יַתּוּשׁ שֶׁמַּכְנִיס וְאֵינוֹ מוֹצִיא, שֶׁהִיא קְלִפָּה הַיּוֹתֵר תַּחְתּוֹנָה וּרְחוֹקָה מִבְּחִינַת הַקְּדֻשָּׁה הַמַּשְׁפַּעַת בְּתַכְלִית הָרִחוּק, קוֹדֶמֶת לָאִישׁ הַחוֹטֵא בְּהִשְׁתַּלְשְׁלוּת וִירִידַת הַחִיּוּת מֵרָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן בָּרוּךְ הוּא. וְכָל שֶׁכֵּן שְׁאָר בַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים הַטְּמֵאִים, וַאֲפִלּוּ חַיּוֹת רָעוֹת, שֶׁכֻּלָּם אֵינָם מְשַׁנִּים תַּפְקִידָם, וּפְקֻדָּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ שָׁמְרָה רוּחָם, וְאַף עַל גַּב דְּאִיהוּ לָא חָזֵי וכו'. וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "וּמוֹרַאֲכֶם וְחִתְּכֶם יִהְיֶה עַל כָּל חַיַּת הָאָרֶץ", וּכְפֵרוּשׁ רַזַ"ל, שֶׁאֵין חַיָּה רָעָה מוֹשֶׁלֶת בְּאָדָם אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נִדְמֶה לָהּ כִּבְהֵמָה. וְהַצַּדִּיקִים שֶׁאֵין צֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים מִסְתַּלֵּק מֵעַל פְּנֵיהֶם, כָּל חַיּוֹת רָעוֹת אִתְכַּפְיָן קַמַּיְהוּ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בַּזֹּהַר גַּבֵּי דָּנִיֵּאל בְּגֹב אֲרָיוֹת.
וְאִם כֵּן, הַחוֹטֵא וְעוֹבֵר רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, אֲפִלּוּ בַּעֲבֵרָה קַלָּה, בִּשְׁעַת מַעֲשֶׂה הוּא בְּתַכְלִית הָרִחוּק מִקְּדֻשָּׁה הָעֶלְיוֹנָה, שֶׁהִיא יִחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, יוֹתֵר מִכָּל בַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים הַטְּמֵאִים וּשְׁקָצִים וּרְמָשִׂים, הַמֻּשְׁפָּעִים מִסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפַּת עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה.
In absolute truth, though, even a minor transgression places the one who does it in opposition to the Supreme Will, blessed be He, and cuts him off from His unity and oneness more completely than the sitra achra and kelipah termed “alien gods” and outright “idolatry”, and more than everything that flows from it into this world: the impure domestic and wild animals and birds, and the insects and reptiles. As the saying has it, “The gnat preceded you.” Even the gnat, which consumes and never excretes, the lowest kelipah and the most remote from holiness [holiness being the giving even to what is utterly remote], stands ahead of the sinner in the downward flow of life from the Supreme Will, blessed be He. Much more so the remaining impure creatures, and the predatory beasts too: none of them deviates from its assigned role, and His decree preserves their spirit, “and though it does not see, [its mazal, its spiritual source, does see].” So the verse says: “Fear and terror of you will fall upon every animal of the land,” and our Sages taught: “A wild animal attacks a person only if he looks to it like a beast.” Before tzaddikim, whose faces never lose the divine image, every predator submits, as the Zohar relates concerning Daniel among the lions.
If so, one who sins and goes against His will, blessed be He, even with a light sin, is at the time of the act at the utmost distance from the supreme holiness, which is His unity and oneness, blessed be He, more than all the unclean creatures and the creeping and crawling things that receive their flow from the sitra achra and the kelipah of idolatry.
Now the principle in full: even a light sin, at the moment it is done, puts a person lower than the unclean creatures that draw life from the kelipos, and lower than the gnat.
“The gnat came before you” simply means it was created first; the Alter Rebbe reads it as rank. The gnat takes in and gives nothing out, the mark of the lowest kelipah, for holiness gives, even to the distant. Yet it stands above the sinner in the descent of life from G‑d’s will. The other creatures, even wild beasts, never change their task: they overpower a man only when sin has made him look like an animal, and they bow before a tzaddik, as the lions did before Daniel. Animals have no choice. Only a human being can step outside G‑d’s will, so only he can fall below them all.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #64 (ch. 24b) — 45:23, 54:17, 55:20, 55:25, 56:42, 57:10, 57:57, 58:27, 58:50, 59:02, 1:00:35, 1:05:49, 1:06:05, 1:07:05, 1:07:27, 1:09:35, 1:10:06, 1:11:45, 1:12:05, 1:12:30, 1:13:22, 1:13:44, 1:18:31, 1:19:09, 1:20:13
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 2 — 13:37, 14:19, 14:49, 15:25, 16:04, 40:25, 41:04
7.Why life overrides most prohibitions
וּמַה שֶׁפִּקּוּחַ נֶפֶשׁ דּוֹחֶה שְׁאָר עֲבֵרוֹת, וְגַם יַעֲבֹר וְאַל יֵהָרֵג, הַיְנוּ כְּפֵרוּשׁ חֲזַ"ל: "אָמְרָה תּוֹרָה, חַלֵּל עָלָיו שַׁבָּת אַחַת כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּשְׁמֹר שַׁבָּתוֹת הַרְבֵּה", וְלֹא מִשּׁוּם קַלּוּת הָעֲבֵרוֹת וְחֻמְרָן.
[תֵּדַע, שֶׁהֲרֵי שַׁבָּת חֲמוּרָה וּשְׁקוּלָה כַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה לְעִנְיַן שְׁחִיטַת מוּמָר לְדָבָר אֶחָד, בְּיוֹרֶה דֵּעָה סִימָן ב', מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן בְּמוּמָר לְגִלּוּי עֲרָיוֹת; וַאֲפִלּוּ הָכִי פִּקּוּחַ נֶפֶשׁ דּוֹחֶה שַׁבָּת וְלֹא גִּלּוּי עֲרָיוֹת. אֶלָּא דִּגְזֵרַת הַכָּתוּב הוּא].
As for saving a life overriding the other prohibitions, and the rule “let him transgress and not be killed”: this is as our Sages explained, “The Torah said: desecrate one Shabbos for him, so that he may keep many Shabbosos.” It is not because of how light or severe the sins are.
[Proof of this: Shabbos is severe and equal to idolatry regarding the slaughtering of one who habitually transgresses one particular commandment (Yoreh De’ah, section 2), which is not so for one who habitually transgresses in forbidden relations. And even so, saving a life overrides Shabbos but not forbidden relations. Rather, it is a decree of Scripture.]
An objection: one must die rather than commit idolatry, forbidden relations or murder, but may break other prohibitions to save a life. Isn’t idolatry in a class of its own?
No. Life overrides Shabbos because “desecrate one Shabbos so that he will keep many”: Shabbos itself, so to speak, asks to be broken now so it can be kept for years. And the proof: for shechita, habitually breaking Shabbos counts like idolatry and forbidden relations do not, so Shabbos is the graver; yet life overrides Shabbos and not forbidden relations. The line is a decree of Scripture, not a scale of seriousness.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #65 (ch. 24c) — 15:29, 16:05, 16:43, 17:51, 18:21, 19:10, 19:21, 19:53, 21:08, 22:27, 25:02, 25:27, 25:48, 26:22, 26:35, 27:26, 27:32
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 2 — 47:21, 48:26, 49:17, 49:41, 50:09, 50:54, 51:35
8.After the sin: where the differences begin
אֶלָּא שֶׁלְּאַחַר מַעֲשֵׂה הַחֵטְא, אִם הִיא מֵעֲבֵרוֹת שֶׁאֵין בָּהֶן כָּרֵת וּמִיתָה בִּידֵי שָׁמַיִם, שֶׁאֵין נַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית מֵתָה לְגַמְרֵי וְנִכְרֶתֶת מִשָּׁרְשָׁהּ בֵּאלֹהִים חַיִּים, רַק שֶׁנִּפְגָּם קְצָת דְּבֵקוּתָהּ וַאֲחִיזָתָהּ בְּשָׁרְשָׁהּ בְּחֵטְא זֶה
[הגהה: וּלְפִי עֶרֶךְ וְחִלּוּקֵי בְּחִינַת הַפְּגָם בַּנֶּפֶשׁ וּבְשָׁרְשָׁהּ בָּעֶלְיוֹנִים, כָּךְ הֵם חִלּוּקֵי בְּחִינַת הַמֵּרוּק וְהָעֹנֶשׁ, בַּגֵּיהִנֹּם אוֹ בָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה, לְכָל עָוֹן וְחֵטְא עֹנֶשׁ מְיֻחָד לְמָרֵק וּלְהַעֲבִיר הַלִּכְלוּךְ וְהַפְּגָם. וְכֵן בְּחַיְּבֵי מִיתָה וְכָרֵת אֵין פּוֹגְמִין כֻּלָּם בְּשָׁוֶה].
הֲרֵי גַּם נַפְשׁוֹ הַחִיּוּנִית הַבַּהֲמִית הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּגוּפוֹ, וְכֵן גּוּפוֹ, חוֹזְרִים וְעוֹלִים מִסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא לִקְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בָּהֶם, הַמַּאֲמִינָה בַּה' אֶחָד. וְגַם בִּשְׁעַת הַחֵטְא הָיְתָה בְּאָמְנָה אִתּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, רַק שֶׁהָיְתָה בִּבְחִינַת גָּלוּת מַמָּשׁ תּוֹךְ נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית מִסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא, הַמַּחֲטִיאָה אֶת הַגּוּף וּמוֹרִידַתּוּ עִמָּהּ בְּעִמְקֵי שְׁאוֹל לְמַטָּה מַטָּה תַּחַת טֻמְאַת הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפַּת עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, ה' יִשְׁמְרֵנוּ.
Once the sin has been committed, however, if it is not among the sins punished by kares [spiritual “excision”] or by death at Heaven’s hand, his G‑dly soul has not died entirely or been severed from its root in the living G‑d; its bond with its root and its grip on it have merely been weakened somewhat by this sin,
Note: The ways the soul is cleansed and punished, in Gehinnom or in this world, vary with the degree and kind of harm done to the soul and to its root above: each iniquity and sin has its own punishment, to wash away the stain and repair the harm. Even among the sins that carry death or kares, not all do the same harm.
then his vital, animal soul, which is clothed in his body, and his body too, return and rise up from this sitra achra and kelipah, and come close to the holiness of the G‑dly soul clothed in them, which believes in the One G‑d. Even at the time of the sin it was faithful to Him, blessed be He; only it was in a state of real exile inside the animal soul from the sitra achra, which makes the body sin and brings it down with it to the depths of She’ol, lower and lower, beneath the impurity of the sitra achra and the kelipah of idolatry, may G‑d save us.
Only now does the Alter Rebbe allow differences between sins, and they come after the act. A mashal: under a king, any act against his order is treason, and at that moment there is no “a little treason”. But the consequences differ greatly: handing state secrets to the enemy is not the same as a small breach of a royal order.
Elsewhere (Iggeres HaTeshuvah) the soul is pictured bound to its source by a rope of 613 strands. Each sin cuts its own strand and weakens the rope; sins of kares or death at the hands of Heaven cut it through. Each sin leaves its own stain, and the punishment matches it because its purpose is to cleanse. Through teshuvah even a severed bond can be tied again. And the G‑dly soul never stopped believing. During the sin it was a captive; afterwards the animal soul and body rise back toward it.
Sources
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 3 — 05:20, 05:43, 05:54, 06:14, 06:37, 06:56, 07:08, 07:24, 16:49, 17:05, 18:01, 19:53, 20:11, 20:35, 21:54, 31:40, 32:04, 33:10, 34:15
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #65 (ch. 24c) — 32:35, 32:53, 33:14, 33:31, 33:55, 34:41, 37:13, 37:58, 38:16, 41:39, 42:24, 42:46, 43:40, 43:56, 1:01:30, 1:03:05
9.The king’s head
וְאֵין לְךָ גָּלוּת גָּדוֹל מִזֶּה, מֵאִגָּרָא רָמָה כו', וּכְמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר לְעֵיל דְּשֹׁרֶשׁ וּמְקוֹר נַפְשׁוֹת כָּל בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל הוּא מֵחָכְמָה עִלָּאָה, וְהוּא יִתְבָּרַךְ וְחָכְמָתוֹ אֶחָד וכו'.
וְהוּא כִּמְשַׁל הָאוֹחֵז בְּרֹאשׁוֹ שֶׁל מֶלֶךְ וּמוֹרִידוֹ לְמַטָּה וְטוֹמֵן פָּנָיו בְּתוֹךְ בֵּית הַכִּסֵּא מָלֵא צוֹאָה, שֶׁאֵין לְךָ עֶלְבּוֹן גָּדוֹל מִזֶּה, אֲפִלּוּ עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן לְפִי שָׁעָה. שֶׁהַקְּלִפּוֹת וְסִטְרָא אַחֲרָא נִקְרָאוֹת קִיא צוֹאָה כַּנּוֹדָע.
No exile is worse than this: falling “from a lofty rooftop [into a deep pit]”. For, as chapter 2 explained, every Jewish soul is rooted and sourced in supernal Wisdom, which is one with Him…
Picture a man who seizes a king by the head, drags him down, and thrusts his face into a latrine overflowing with filth. No disgrace could exceed this, even if it lasts only a moment. For the kelipos and the sitra achra are termed “vomit and excrement”, as is known.
The G‑dly soul comes from G‑d’s wisdom, which is one with Him: it is the king’s head. A sin forces it into the kelipah, called “vomit and filth”, and “only for a moment” is no defence.
Yet the picture also comforts. The soul in the pit is still the king’s head; it was in exile, not changed. And the love that would give its life rather than be parted from G‑d is still there. Chapter 25 shows how to use it.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #65 (ch. 24c) — 1:05:45, 1:06:15, 1:06:30, 1:07:02, 1:07:38, 1:07:45, 1:08:40, 1:09:24, 1:10:43, 1:10:50, 1:16:58, 1:17:20
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 3 — 35:24, 35:49, 36:15, 36:32, 37:05, 37:21
The Yesod: In the moment of sin there are no small sins, and the soul never agrees
We usually rank sins by size, and the small ones hardly feel like leaving G‑d. Chapter 24 takes that feeling away. At the moment of the act, every sin, even a light rabbinic one, says: what I want decides, not what G‑d wants. It is “as though” he denies G‑d’s oneness, in deed if not in belief, and for that moment it puts a person further from G‑d’s oneness than the kelipah of idolatry, which never disobeys its Master.
The aim is not to frighten. The chapter’s appeal is not to fear of punishment but to the reality of separation, and the punishment it does mention it calls cleansing. It corrects a feeling. The Jew who would die rather than make an empty bow to an idol does other wrongs easily, because they do not feel like leaving G‑d. That gap between feeling and truth is the “spirit of folly”. The problem is less that we are weak than that we are numb. Once a person sees every sin as the same choice in smaller clothes, the strength that would face death is enough to face a passing desire.
And the chapter is hopeful. The G‑dly soul never agreed to the sin: a king held in a pit, not a king turned peasant. Afterwards the body and animal soul rise back toward it, and teshuvah can mend even the worst break. The differences between sins are real, but they belong to the damage and its repair, not to how far the moment itself takes a person from G‑d. So a person learns two things at once: nothing done against G‑d’s will is “just small”, and nothing done has changed who he is underneath. How to awaken that hidden love is chapter 25.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #64 (ch. 24b) — 38:15, 39:09, 1:20:13
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #63 (ch. 24a) — 56:48
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 1 — 39:33, 40:16, 44:01, 49:00
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 24 part 3 — 16:49, 17:05, 37:47, 38:46, 38:52
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #65 (ch. 24c) — 42:46, 1:16:58, 1:17:12, 1:18:01
Points to ponder
- Which “small” wrongs do I do easily because they don’t feel like leaving G‑d?
- “In my heart I still believe.” Where do I use that to excuse what my hands, mouth or thoughts do?
- I would give my life rather than deny G‑d. How can I draw on that love the next time a small desire pulls?
- Where does my ego, not G‑d’s will, still have the final word?
- After I slip, do I remember that my soul never agreed, and that the way back is open?