תניאTanya Explained

פרק כט

Chapter 29: Timtum HaLev: When the Heart Turns to Stone

In short

Sometimes a person understands everything and feels nothing: the heart is dull and prayer will not open. The cause is the inflated ego of the animal soul, and the remedy is to humble it and thunder against it until it falls back into the nothing it really is. Doubts in faith come from the same empty source.

1.A heart like stone

אַךְ עוֹד אַחַת צָרִיךְ לָשִׁית עֵצוֹת בְּנַפְשׁוֹת הַבֵּינוֹנִים, אֲשֶׁר לִפְעָמִים וְעִתִּים רַבִּים יֵשׁ לָהֶם טִמְטוּם הַלֵּב, שֶׁנַּעֲשֶׂה כָּאֶבֶן, וְלֹא יָכוֹל לִפְתֹּחַ לִבּוֹ בְּשׁוּם אֹפֶן לַעֲבוֹדָה שֶׁבַּלֵּב זוֹ תְּפִלָּה.

וְגַם לִפְעָמִים לֹא יוּכַל לְהִלָּחֵם עִם הַיֵּצֶר לְקַדֵּשׁ עַצְמוֹ בַּמֻּתָּר לוֹ, מִפְּנֵי כְּבֵדוּת שֶׁבְּלִבּוֹ.

Translation

But there is one more thing for which the souls of beinonim need advice. At times, and even often, they have timtum halev, a dullness of the heart: it becomes like stone, and he cannot open his heart in any way to the “service of the heart”, which is prayer [Taanis 2a].

Also, at times he cannot fight the yetzer and sanctify himself in what is permitted to him, because of a heaviness in his heart.

Explanation

Chapters 26 to 28 dealt with sadness and its causes. Timtum halev, a “stopped-up” heart, is different: it can come when nothing is wrong at all. The person understands, but nothing moves him.

It shows in two places. In prayer the heart is not an extra; it is the prayer itself. And holding back from what is permitted (chapter 27) takes a heart that cares. Forbidden things he still never does; that is what makes him a beinoni. But the battle over the permitted needs a heart that feels.

Sources

2.Splinter the beam

וְזֹאת הִיא עֵצָה הַיְּעוּצָה בַּזֹּהַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ, דְּאָמַר רַב מְתִיבְתָּא בְּגַן עֵדֶן: אָעָא דְּלָא סָלֵק בֵּהּ נְהוֹרָא, מְבַטְּשִׁין לֵהּ כו'. גּוּפָא דְּלָא סָלֵק בֵּהּ נְהוֹרָא דְּנִשְׁמְתָא, מְבַטְּשִׁין לֵהּ כו'.

פֵּרוּשׁ נְהוֹרָא דְּנִשְׁמְתָא, שֶׁאוֹר הַנְּשָׁמָה וְהַשֵּׂכֶל אֵינוֹ מֵאִיר כָּל כָּךְ לִמְשֹׁל עַל חָמְרִיּוּת שֶׁבַּגּוּף.

וְאַף שֶׁמֵּבִין וּמִתְבּוֹנֵן בְּשִׂכְלוֹ בִּגְדֻלַּת ה', אֵינוֹ נִתְפָּס וְנִדְבָּק בְּמֹחוֹ כָּל כָּךְ שֶׁיּוּכַל לִמְשֹׁל עַל חָמְרִיּוּת הַלֵּב, מֵחֲמַת חָמְרִיּוּתָן וְגַסּוּתָן. וְהַסִּבָּה הִיא גַּסּוּת הַקְּלִפָּה, שֶׁמַּגְבִּיהַּ עַצְמָהּ עַל אוֹר קְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית, וּמַסְתֶּרֶת וּמַחֲשִׁיכָה אוֹרָהּ.

Translation

The remedy here is the one the holy Zohar gives. The head of the heavenly academy said: “When a log will not catch the flame, you break it into pieces … when a body will not let the soul’s light catch hold, you crush it …” [Zohar III:168a].

“The soul’s light” here means the radiance of the soul and of the mind, which is too weak in him to master the body’s coarseness.

He does grasp G‑d’s greatness and reflect on it, yet that understanding does not take a firm enough hold in his mind to overpower the heart, so dense and gross is the heart. What causes this is the grossness of the kelipah: it lifts itself up over the holy light of the G‑dly soul, covering it and dimming its glow.

Explanation

When a heavy log will not catch, more fuel does not help. You split it. So the answer to a dull heart is not more of the same contemplation. The soul’s fire is fine; the “wood” must change.

What blocks it is the kelipah, the ego of the animal soul, swollen until it covers the heart. (The text speaks of mind and heart. A beinoni’s mind stays in control, chapter 17; the Zohar also includes one whose mind is dull.)

Sources

3.Who is the “I”?

וְלָזֹאת צָרִיךְ לְבַטְּשָׁהּ וּלְהַשְׁפִּילָהּ לֶעָפָר. דְּהַיְנוּ לִקְבֹּעַ עִתִּים לְהַשְׁפִּיל עַצְמוֹ, לִהְיוֹת נִבְזֶה בְּעֵינָיו נִמְאָס, כַּכָּתוּב: "לֵב נִשְׁבָּר", "רוּחַ נִשְׁבָּרָה", הִיא הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא, שֶׁהִיא הִיא הָאָדָם עַצְמוֹ בַּבֵּינוֹנִים, שֶׁנֶּפֶשׁ הַחִיּוּנִית הַמְּחַיָּה הַגּוּף הִיא בְּתָקְפָּהּ כְּתוֹלַדְתָּהּ בְּלִבּוֹ, נִמְצָא הִיא הִיא הָאָדָם עַצְמוֹ.

וְעַל נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית שֶׁבּוֹ נֶאֱמַר: "נְשָׁמָה שֶׁנָּתַתָּ בִּי טְהוֹרָה הִיא", "שֶׁנָּתַתָּ בִּי" דַּיְקָא, מִכְּלַל שֶׁהָאָדָם עַצְמוֹ אֵינֶנּוּ הַנְּשָׁמָה הַטְּהוֹרָה. כִּי אִם בַּצַּדִּיקִים, שֶׁבָּהֶם הוּא לְהֵפֶךְ, שֶׁנְּשָׁמָה הַטְּהוֹרָה, שֶׁהִיא נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית, הוּא הָאָדָם, וְגוּפָם נִקְרָא בְּשַׂר אָדָם.

וּכְמַאֲמַר הִלֵּל הַזָּקֵן לְתַלְמִידָיו כְּשֶׁהָיָה הוֹלֵךְ לֶאֱכֹל, הָיָה אוֹמֵר שֶׁהוּא הוֹלֵךְ לִגְמֹל חֶסֶד עִם הָעֲלוּבָה וַעֲנִיָּה, הוּא גּוּפוֹ. כִּי כְּמוֹ זָר נֶחְשַׁב אֶצְלוֹ, וְלָכֵן אָמַר שֶׁהוּא גּוֹמֵל חֶסֶד עִמּוֹ בְּמַה שֶּׁמַּאֲכִילוֹ. כִּי הוּא עַצְמוֹ אֵינוֹ רַק נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית לְבַד, כִּי הִיא לְבַדָּהּ מְחַיָּה גּוּפוֹ וּבְשָׂרוֹ. שֶׁהָרַע שֶׁהָיָה בַּנֶּפֶשׁ הַחִיּוּנִית הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּדָמוֹ וּבְשָׂרוֹ נִתְהַפֵּךְ לְטוֹב, וְנִכְלַל בִּקְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית מַמָּשׁ בַּצַּדִּיקִים.

אֲבָל בַּבֵּינוֹנִי, מֵאַחַר שֶׁמַּהוּתָהּ וְעַצְמוּתָהּ שֶׁל נֶפֶשׁ הַחִיּוּנִית הַבַּהֲמִית שֶׁמִּסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא, הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּדָמוֹ וּבְשָׂרוֹ, לֹא נֶהְפַּךְ לְטוֹב, הֲרֵי הִיא הִיא הָאָדָם עַצְמוֹ.

Translation

So the body has to be crushed and brought low, down to the dust. In practice this means fixing times to humble himself, becoming “lowly and contemptible in his own sight,” in the words of the verse, with “a heart that is shattered and a spirit that is broken.” That “spirit” is the sitra achra, and in the beinoni it is his very self. The vital soul animating his body still reigns in his heart with all the strength it had from birth, so it is he himself.

About the G‑dly soul within him we say, “The soul You have given me is pure.” The words “You have given me” show that the pure soul is not the person himself. Tzaddikim are the opposite case: for them the pure, G‑dly soul is who they are, and their body is merely what is called “human flesh.”

So Hillel the Elder, on his way to a meal, would tell his students that he was off to do a favour for “the poor, humble guest,” by which he meant his own body. He looked on the body as a stranger, which is why feeding it counted as doing it a kindness. His real self was the G‑dly soul alone, for that alone was the life of his body. In tzaddikim, whatever evil the vital soul held (the soul that wears the body’s blood and flesh) has already been changed to good and merged into the holiness of the G‑dly soul itself.

In the beinoni, though, the vital soul that comes from the sitra achra and wears his blood and flesh is still unchanged in its substance and essence; it has not become good. That is why it is his very self.

Explanation

The remedy is humility at times set aside for it, and not harm to the body: what is crushed is the swollen spirit of the kelipah.

And in a beinoni that spirit is the man himself. The self he wakes up with, the one that says “I want”, is the animal soul. “The soul You placed in me”: there is a “me” that holds the pure soul, and it is not that soul. Hillel’s real self was his soul, so feeding his body was a kindness to a poor guest.

His G‑dly soul is still his deeper, truer self. But day to day he lives in the animal soul, so humbling his ego humbles the sitra achra itself.

Sources

4.Lower than a worm

וְאִם כֵּן הוּא רָחוֹק מֵה' בְּתַכְלִית הָרִחוּק. שֶׁהֲרֵי כֹּחַ הַמִּתְאַוֶּה שֶׁבְּנַפְשׁוֹ הַבַּהֲמִית יָכוֹל גַּם כֵּן לְהִתְאַוּוֹת לִדְבָרִים הָאֲסוּרִים שֶׁהֵם נֶגֶד רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, אַף שֶׁאֵינוֹ מִתְאַוֶּה לַעֲשׂוֹתָם בְּפֹעַל מַמָּשׁ חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, רַק שֶׁאֵינָם מְאוּסִים אֶצְלוֹ בֶּאֱמֶת כְּבַצַּדִּיקִים, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר לְעֵיל (פרק יב). וּבָזֶה הוּא גָּרוּעַ וּמְשֻׁקָּץ וּמְתֹעָב יוֹתֵר מִבַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים הַטְּמֵאִים וּשְׁקָצִים וּרְמָשִׂים, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל, וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "וְאָנֹכִי תוֹלַעַת וְלֹא אִישׁ" וגו'.

[וְגַם כְּשֶׁמִּתְגַּבֶּרֶת בּוֹ נַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית לְעוֹרֵר הָאַהֲבָה לַה' בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּפִלָּה, אֵינָהּ בֶּאֱמֶת לַאֲמִתּוֹ לְגַמְרֵי, מֵאַחַר שֶׁחוֹלֶפֶת וְעוֹבֶרֶת אַחַר הַתְּפִלָּה, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל סוֹף פרק יג.]

Translation

That being so, he stands about as far from G‑d as a person can. His animal soul is still capable of craving what is forbidden, things contrary to G‑d’s will. He has no intention of acting on those cravings, G‑d forbid, but he does not genuinely loathe them the way tzaddikim do, as chapter 12 explained. On that count he is lower, more repellent and more detestable than impure beasts, bugs and crawling creatures, as was said in chapter 24, and as the verse puts it, “I am a worm, no man at all.”

(Even when his G‑dly soul gathers strength in him to awaken love of G‑d during prayer, this is not complete truth, since it passes and is gone after prayer, as explained above at the end of chapter 13.)

Explanation

The beinoni never sins, but a forbidden thought can still attract him. He pushes it away (chapter 12) without finding it repulsive, as a tzaddik does. Unclean animals and insects never act against G‑d’s will. He does, in thought, and he could choose otherwise. A worm is a worm by creation; a person who lowers himself does it by choice.

This is not a verdict on his worth. It is a sober look at the natural self, meant to deflate it. Even his love in prayer fades afterward, and what is fully true does not change.

Sources

5.“My sin is always before me”

וּבִפְרָט כְּשֶׁיִּזְכֹּר טֻמְאַת נַפְשׁוֹ בְּחַטַּאת נְעוּרִים וְהַפְּגָם שֶׁעָשָׂה בָּעֶלְיוֹנִים, וְשָׁם הוּא לְמַעְלָה מֵהַזְּמָן, וּכְאִלּוּ פָּגַם וְנִטְמָא הַיּוֹם חַס וְשָׁלוֹם מַמָּשׁ.

וְאַף שֶׁכְּבָר עָשָׂה תְּשׁוּבָה נְכוֹנָה, הֲרֵי עִקַּר הַתְּשׁוּבָה בַּלֵּב, וְהַלֵּב יֵשׁ בּוֹ בְּחִינוֹת וּמַדְרֵגוֹת רַבּוֹת, וְהַכֹּל לְפִי מַה שֶּׁהוּא אָדָם וּלְפִי הַזְּמָן וְהַמָּקוֹם, כַּיָּדוּעַ לַיּוֹדְעִים.

וְלָכֵן עַכְשָׁיו, בְּשָׁעָה זוֹ שֶׁרוֹאֶה בְּעַצְמוֹ דְּלָא סָלֵק בֵּהּ נְהוֹרָא דְּנִשְׁמְתָא, מִכְּלָל שֶׁהַיּוֹם לֹא נִתְקַבְּלָה תְּשׁוּבָתוֹ וַעֲוֹנוֹתָיו מַבְדִּילִים. אוֹ שֶׁרוֹצִים לְהַעֲלוֹתוֹ לִתְשׁוּבָה עִלָּאָה יוֹתֵר מֵעֻמְקָא דְּלִבָּא יוֹתֵר. וְלָכֵן אָמַר דָּוִד: "וְחַטָּאתִי נֶגְדִּי תָּמִיד".

Translation

How much more so when he recalls how he soiled his soul through the sin of his youth, and the damage he did in the realms above. There, time does not exist, so it is as though that damage and defilement were done this very day, G‑d forbid.

And even though he has already done proper teshuvah, the essence of teshuvah is in the heart, and the heart has many levels and stages. Everything depends on what kind of person he is, and on the time and the place, as is known to those who know.

So right now, when he notices that “the soul’s light will not catch hold in him,” one of two things must be true. Either his teshuvah has not been accepted today and his sins still stand between [him and G‑d], or he is being pushed on toward a higher teshuvah that comes from a deeper place in the heart. This is why David said, “My sin is before me constantly.”

Explanation

Above there is no time, so an old sin stands as if done today. And teshuvah lives in the heart, which has many depths. More is asked of a person at a higher level, or of one who is no longer tempted by that sin. What was enough then may not be enough now.

A mashal: a child burns a valuable painting in a tantrum and is sorry, as a child is. Grown up, and more so after studying art, he regrets it far more. Teshuvah grows with the person.

So a dull heart means either a sin still stands in the way, or, and this is a kindness, he is being lifted to a deeper teshuvah. So David, whose evil inclination was as if dead within him, still said “my sin is always before me.”

Sources

6.A master of accounts

וְגַם מִי שֶׁהוּא נָקִי מֵחַטּאוֹת נְעוּרִים הַחֲמוּרִים, יָשִׂים אֶל לִבּוֹ לְקַיֵּם מַאֲמַר זֹהַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ לִהְיוֹת מִמָּארֵי דְּחֻשְׁבְּנָא. דְּהַיְנוּ לַעֲשֹוֹת חֶשְׁבּוֹן עִם נַפְשׁוֹ מִכָּל הַמַּחֲשָׁבוֹת וְהַדִּבּוּרִים וְהמַעֲשִׂים שֶׁחָלְפוּ וְעָבְרוּ מִיּוֹם הֱיוֹתוֹ עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה, אִם הָיוּ כֻּלָּם מִצַּד הַקְּדֻשָּׁה אוֹ מִצַּד הַטֻּמְאָה רַחֲמָנָא לִצְּלָן. דְּהַיְנוּ כָּל הַמַּחֲשָׁבוֹת וְהַדִּבּוּרִים וְהַמַּעֲשִׂים אֲשֶׁר לֹא לַה' הֵמָּה וְלִרְצוֹנוֹ וְלַעֲבוֹדָתוֹ, שֶׁזֶּהוּ פֵּרוּשׁ לְשׁוֹן "סִטְרָא אַחֲרָא", כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל (בְּפֶרֶק ו').

וּמֻדַּעַת זֹאת, כִּי כָל עֵת שֶׁהָאָדָם מְחַשֵׁב מַחֲשָׁבוֹת קְדוֹשׁוֹת, נַעֲשֶׂה מֶרְכָּבָה בְּעֵת זוֹ לְהֵיכְלוֹת הַקְּדֻשָּׁה, שֶׁמֵּהֶן מֻשְׁפָּעוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת הַלָּלוּ. וְכֵן לְהֵפֶךְ, נַעֲשֶׂה מֶרְכָּבָה טְמֵאָה בְּעֵת זוֹ לְהֵיכְלוֹת הַטֻּמְאָה שֶׁמֵּהֶן מֻשְׁפָּעוֹת כָּל מַחֲשָׁבוֹת רָעוֹת. וְכֵן בְּדִבּוּר וּמַעֲשֶׂה.

עוֹד יָשִׂים אֶל לִבּוֹ רֹב חֲלוֹמוֹתָיו, שֶׁהֵם הֶבֶל וּרְעוּת רוּחַ, מִשּׁוּם שֶׁאֵין נַפְשׁוֹ עוֹלָה לְמַעְלָה. וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "מִי יַעֲלֶה בְּהַר ה'... נְקִי כַפַּיִם" וגו'. וְאִנּוּן סִטְרִין בִּישִׁין אָתְיָן וּמִתְדַּבְּקָן בֵּהּ וּמוֹדְעִין לֵהּ בְּחֶלְמָא מִלִּין דְּעָלְמָא וכו'. וּלְזִמְנִין דְּחַיְכָן בֵּהּ, וְאַחְזִיאוּ לֵהּ מִלֵּי שְׁקָר, וְצַעֲרִין לֵהּ בְּחֶלְמֵהּ כו', כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בַּזֹּהַר וַיִּקְרָא (כה,א-ב), עַיֵּן שָׁם בַּאֲרִיכוּת.

וְהִנֵּה כָּל מַה שֶׁיַּאֲרִיךְ בְּעִנְיָנִים אֵלּוּ בְּמַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ, וְגַם בְּעִיּוּנוֹ בַּסְּפָרִים, לִהְיוֹת לִבּוֹ נִשְׁבָּר בְּקִרְבּוֹ, וְ"נִבְזֶה בְּעֵינָיו נִמְאָס" כַּכָּתוּב בְּתַכְלִית הַמִּאוּס, וּלְמָאֵס חַיָּיו מַמָּשׁ. הֲרֵי בָּזֶה מְמָאֵס וּמְבַזֶּה הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּמַשְׁפִּילָהּ לֶעָפָר, וּמוֹרִידָהּ מִגְּדֻלָּתָהּ וְגַסּוּת רוּחָהּ וְגַבְהוּתָהּ, שֶׁמַּגְבִּיהַּ אֶת עַצְמָהּ עַל אוֹר קְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית לְהַחְשִׁיךְ אוֹרָהּ.

Translation

Even someone who never committed the grave sins of youth ought to take the Zohar’s advice and become one of the “keepers of the reckoning” [Zohar III:178a]. He should review, before his own soul, every thought, word and act from the day he was born until now. Did each one come from holiness, or from impurity, Heaven protect us? Impurity here covers any thought, word or act not directed to G‑d, His will and His service; that is exactly what sitra achra means, as chapter 6 explained.

We know that at any moment a person is thinking holy thoughts, he is in that moment a “chariot” for the heichalos (chambers) of holiness that those thoughts come from. The converse also holds: at that moment he becomes a chariot of impurity for the impure heichalos, the source of every bad thought. The same applies to what he says and what he does.

Let him also reflect that most of his dreams are “futility and a grasping at wind,” since his soul does not climb on high, as the verse asks, “Who shall go up G‑d’s mountain? The one whose hands are clean …” Rather, “forces of the evil side come and cling to him, and inform him in his dream about the matters of this world … and at times they make sport of him, show him lies, and trouble him in his dream …” So says the Zohar on Vayikra (25a–b); look there for the full treatment.

Now the more he keeps turning these matters over in his mind, and reads about them in books, until his heart breaks inside him and he becomes “lowly and contemptible in his own sight,” as the verse says, wholly contemptible, so that he truly finds his own life repugnant, the more he humiliates and shames the sitra achra. He casts it down to the dust and topples it from its grandeur, its grossness and its arrogance, the very things by which it lifts itself over the holy light of the G‑dly soul to dim it.

Explanation

A “master of accounts” is an owner going over his own books, not a hired clerk. Was each thought, word and deed for G‑d? “The other side” includes anything not for G‑d, even if it is not a sin.

Every thought makes him a “chariot”, a vehicle for the chamber it comes from. And dreams that are mostly empty show that his soul did not rise at night.

This is not meant to make him depressed about every thought (chapter 27). “Despising his life” is aimed at the sitra achra: what is broken is its pride, not the person.

Sources

7.Thunder against it

וְגַם יַרְעִים עָלֶיהָ בְּקוֹל רַעַשׁ וְרֹגֶז לְהַשְׁפִּילָהּ, כְּמַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: "לְעוֹלָם יַרְגִּיז אָדָם יֵצֶר טוֹב עַל יֵצֶר הָרַע, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: רִגְזוּ וגו'", דְּהַיְנוּ לִרְגֹּז עַל נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית, שֶׁהִיא יִצְרוֹ הָרַע, בְּקוֹל רַעַשׁ וְרֹגֶז בְּמַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ לוֹמַר לוֹ: אַתָּה רַע וְרָשָׁע וּמְשֻׁקָּץ וּמְתֹעָב וּמְנֻוָּל וכו', כְּכָל הַשֵּׁמוֹת שֶׁקָּרְאוּ לוֹ חֲכָמֵינוּ זַ"ל. בֶּאֱמֶת, עַד מָתַי תַּסְתִּיר לִפְנֵי אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא הַמְּמַלֵּא כָּל עָלְמִין, הָיָה הֹוֶה וְיִהְיֶה בְּשָׁוֶה, גַּם בְּמָקוֹם זֶה שֶׁאֲנִי עָלָיו, כְּמוֹ שֶׁהָיָה אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא לְבַדּוֹ קֹדֶם שֶׁנִּבְרָא הָעוֹלָם, בְּלִי שׁוּם שִׁנּוּי, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "אֲנִי ה' לֹא שָׁנִיתִי", כִּי הוּא לְמַעְלָה מֵהַזְּמָן וכו'. וְאַתָּה מְנֻוָּל וכו' מַכְחִישׁ הָאֱמֶת הַנִּרְאֶה לָעֵינַיִם, דְּכֹלָּא קַמֵּהּ כְּלֹא מַמָּשׁ בֶּאֱמֶת בִּבְחִינַת רְאִיָּה חוּשִׁית.

וְהִנֵּה עַל יְדֵי זֶה יוֹעִיל לְנַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית, לְהָאִיר עֵינֶיהָ בֶּאֱמֶת יִחוּד אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בִּרְאִיָּה חוּשִׁית, וְלֹא בְּחִינַת שְׁמִיעָה וַהֲבָנָה לְבַדָּהּ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּמָקוֹם אַחֵר, שֶׁזֶּהוּ שֹׁרֶשׁ כָּל הָעֲבוֹדָה.

Translation

He should also roar at it, in a fierce and angry voice, to bring it low, just as our Sages taught [Berachos 5a]: “A person should forever rouse his good impulse to battle his evil impulse, for the verse says, ‘Tremble with anger, and sin not.’” In other words, he is to storm at his animal soul, his evil impulse, with a fierce and angry voice inside his mind, telling it: “You are wicked and vile, repulsive, loathsome and foul,” and so on, using every name our Sages gave it, and every one of them deserved. “How much longer will you screen from me the light of Ein Sof, blessed be He? That light fills every world. It was, it is and it will be precisely the same, right here where I am standing too, exactly as it was when Ein Sof’s light existed alone before anything was created, without the least change, as the verse says, ‘I am G‑d; I have not changed,’ for He transcends time. And you, repulsive one, deny a truth the eyes can see: that everything before Him is genuinely as nothing, as plainly as physical sight shows it.”

By doing this he comes to the aid of his G‑dly soul, so that its eyes open to the truth that the light of Ein Sof is one, seen as clearly as with bodily eyes and not merely heard and understood. As explained elsewhere, this is the foundation of all divine service.

Explanation

A second way needs no analysis: rage. Here the Alter Rebbe prescribes anger, but only inwardly, in thought, at the evil inclination, never at another person.

He names it for what it is and asks: how long will you hide G‑d, who fills this very place as before creation? Then the G‑dly soul sees G‑d’s oneness as clearly as the eyes see. Something understood can be argued with; something seen cannot.

Sources

8.Darkness has nothing of its own

וְהַטַּעַם, לְפִי שֶׁבֶּאֱמֶת אֵין שׁוּם מַמָּשׁוּת כְּלָל בַּסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא, שֶׁלָּכֵן נִמְשְׁלָה לַחֹשֶׁךְ שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ שׁוּם מַמָּשׁוּת כְּלָל, וּמִמֵּילָא נִדְחֶה מִפְּנֵי הָאוֹר. וְכָךְ הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא, אַף שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ חִיּוּת הַרְבֵּה לְהַחֲיוֹת כָּל בַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים הַטְּמֵאִים, וְנַפְשׁוֹת אֻמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם, וְגַם נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. מִכָּל מָקוֹם הֲרֵי כָּל חִיּוּתָהּ אֵינָהּ מִצַּד עַצְמָהּ חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, אֶלָּא מִצַּד הַקְּדֻשָּׁה, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. וְלָכֵן הִיא בְּטֵלָה לְגַמְרֵי מִפְּנֵי הַקְּדֻשָּׁה, כְּבִטּוּל הַחֹשֶׁךְ מִפְּנֵי הָאוֹר הַגַּשְׁמִי. רַק שֶׁלְּגַבֵּי קְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית שֶׁבָּאָדָם נָתַן לָהּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא רְשׁוּת וִיכֹלֶת לְהַגְבִּיהַּ עַצְמָהּ כְּנֶגְדָּהּ, כְּדֵי שֶׁהָאָדָם יִתְעוֹרֵר לְהִתְגַּבֵּר עָלֶיהָ, לְהַשְׁפִּילָהּ עַל יְדֵי שִׁפְלוּת וּנְמִיכַת רוּחוֹ וְנִבְזֶה בְּעֵינָיו נִמְאָס,

וּבְאִתְעֲרוּתָא דִּלְתַתָּא אִתְעֲרוּתָא דִּלְעֵלָּא, לְקַיֵּם מַה שֶּׁנֶּאֱמַר: "מִשָּׁם אוֹרִידְךָ נְאֻם ה'". דְּהַיְנוּ שֶׁמְּסִירָהּ מִמֶּמְשַׁלְתָּהּ וִיכָלְתָּהּ, וּמְסַלֵּק מִמֶּנָּה הַכֹּחַ וּרְשׁוּת שֶׁנָּתַן לָהּ לְהַגְבִּיהַּ עַצְמָהּ נֶגֶד אוֹר קְדֻשַּׁת נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית, וַאֲזַי מִמֵּילָא בְּטֵלָה וְנִדְחֵית כְּבִטּוּל הַחֹשֶׁךְ מִפְּנֵי אוֹר הַגַּשְׁמִי.

Translation

For the truth is that the sitra achra has no real substance whatever. This is why it is likened to darkness: darkness has no substance either, and it is chased away by light without any effort. So it is with the sitra achra. It does hold a great deal of life force, enough to animate all the impure creatures, the souls of the gentile nations, and the animal soul of a Jew too, as said before. Yet none of that life force belongs to it, G‑d forbid; it all derives from holiness, as said before. So it dissolves entirely in the presence of holiness, as darkness does in the presence of physical light. Only where the holiness of a person’s G‑dly soul is concerned did the Holy One, blessed be He, allow and empower it to rise up in opposition, so that the person would be moved to master it and humble it through his own lowliness and meekness of spirit, becoming “lowly and contemptible in his own sight.”

And “an arousal from below brings an arousal from above,” fulfilling the verse, “From there I shall cast you down, declares G‑d.” Its dominion and its might are stripped away, and the power and licence it had been granted to rise against the holy light of the G‑dly soul are withdrawn. Then it dissolves and vanishes by itself, as darkness does before physical light.

Explanation

Why does shouting work, when it adds no new idea? Because there is nothing there to argue with. The sitra achra is like darkness: you do not fight it, you turn on the light. Its life is borrowed from holiness.

It stands against the G‑dly soul only because G‑d allowed it, so a person has something to overcome. When he lowers it, the permission is withdrawn Above, and its hold disappears.

Sources

9.The spies

וּכְמוֹ שֶׁמָּצִינוּ דָּבָר זֶה מְפֹרָשׁ בַּתּוֹרָה גַּבֵּי מְרַגְּלִים, שֶׁמִּתְּחִלָּה אָמְרוּ: "כִּי חָזָק הוּא מִמֶּנּוּ", אַל תִּקְרֵי מִמֶּנּוּ כו', שֶׁלֹּא הֶאֱמִינוּ בִּיכֹלֶת ה'. וְאַחַר כָּךְ חָזְרוּ וְאָמְרוּ: "הִנֶּנּוּ וְעָלִינוּ" וגו'. וּמֵאַיִן חָזְרָה וּבָאָה לָהֶם הָאֱמוּנָה בִּיכֹלֶת ה'? הֲרֵי לֹא הֶרְאָה לָהֶם מֹשֶׁה רַבֵּנוּ עָלָיו הַשָּׁלוֹם שׁוּם אוֹת וּמוֹפֵת עַל זֶה בֵּינְתַיִם, רַק שֶׁאָמַר לָהֶם אֵיךְ שֶׁקָּצַף ה' עֲלֵיהֶם וְנִשְׁבַּע שֶׁלֹּא לַהֲבִיאָם אֶל הָאָרֶץ. וּמַה הוֹעִיל זֶה לָהֶם, אִם לֹא הָיוּ מַאֲמִינִים בִּיכֹלֶת ה' חַס וְשָׁלוֹם לִכְבֹּשׁ שְׁלֹשִׁים וְאֶחָד מְלָכִים, וּמִפְּנֵי זֶה לֹא רָצוּ כְּלָל לִכָּנֵס לָאָרֶץ?

אֶלָּא וַדַּאי, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁיִּשְׂרָאֵל עַצְמָן הֵם מַאֲמִינִים בְּנֵי מַאֲמִינִים, רַק שֶׁהַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּגוּפָם הִגְבִּיהַּ עַצְמָהּ עַל אוֹר קְדֻשַּׁת נַפְשָׁם הָאֱלֹהִית בְּגַסּוּת רוּחָהּ וְגַבְהוּתָהּ, בְּחֻצְפָּה בְּלִי טַעַם וָדַעַת. וְלָכֵן מִיָּד שֶׁקָּצַף ה' עֲלֵיהֶם וְהִרְעִים בְּקוֹל רַעַשׁ וְרֹגֶז, "עַד מָתַי לָעֵדָה הָרָעָה הַזֹּאת" וגו', "בַּמִּדְבָּר הַזֶּה יִפְּלוּ פִגְרֵיכֶם" וגו', "אֲנִי ה' דִּבַּרְתִּי אִם לֹא זֹאת אֶעֱשֶׂה לְכָל הָעֵדָה הָרָעָה הַזֹּאת" וגו'. וּכְשֶׁשָּׁמְעוּ דְּבָרִים קָשִׁים אֵלּוּ, נִכְנַע וְנִשְׁבַּר לִבָּם בְּקִרְבָּם, כְּדִכְתִיב: "וַיִּתְאַבְּלוּ הָעָם מְאֹד". וּמִמֵּילָא נָפְלָה הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא מִמֶּמְשַׁלְתָּהּ וְגַבְהוּתָהּ וְגַסּוּת רוּחָהּ, וְיִשְׂרָאֵל עַצְמָן הֵם מַאֲמִינִים.

Translation

The Torah says this outright in the story of the spies. First they declared, “He is too strong for us” (“read not ‘for us’ but ‘for Him’”), since they lacked faith in G‑d’s might. Later they changed course and announced, “We will go up …” What brought back their faith in G‑d’s might? In between, Moshe Rabbeinu performed no sign or miracle to prove it. All he did was tell them that G‑d was angry and had sworn they would not enter the Land. Why should that have changed anything for them, if they had no faith, G‑d forbid, that G‑d could vanquish the thirty-one kings, which was the very reason they had refused to enter?

The answer has to be that Jews in themselves are “believers, the children of believers.” What happened was that the sitra achra dressed in their bodies lifted itself over the holy light of their G‑dly soul, out of grossness and arrogance, with sheer impudence and no logic or reason behind it. So the moment G‑d grew angry with them and thundered in a fierce and angry voice, “How long must I put up with this wicked assembly …,” “your carcasses shall drop in this desert …,” “I, G‑d, have spoken; this is surely what I will do to this whole wicked assembly …,” and they heard those severe words, their hearts were humbled and shattered inside them, as the verse records, “The people grieved bitterly.” At that, the sitra achra tumbled from its dominion, its arrogance and its grossness by itself, and the Jews in themselves are believers.

Explanation

The spies said the people of Canaan were “stronger than we”, which the Sages read as “stronger than He”. Then, with no miracle or proof, only G‑d’s anger and a decree, they wanted to go up. That anger could not have convinced people who did not believe.

So they always believed. Their faith was only covered by the sitra achra’s brazen pride. G‑d’s thunder broke their hearts, the cover fell, and the faith came out. That is what a person in timtum halev does to himself.

Sources

10.Doubts in faith

וּמִזֶּה יָכוֹל לִלְמֹד כָּל אָדָם שֶׁנּוֹפְלִים לוֹ בְּמַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ סְפֵקוֹת עַל אֱמוּנָה, כִּי הֵם דִּבְרֵי רוּחַ הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא לְבַדָּהּ הַמַּגְבִּיהַּ עַצְמָהּ עַל נַפְשׁוֹ. אֲבָל יִשְׂרָאֵל עַצְמָן הֵם מַאֲמִינִים כו'.

וְגַם הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא עַצְמָהּ אֵין לָהּ סְפֵקוֹת כְּלָל בֶּאֱמוּנָה, רַק שֶׁנִּתַּן לָהּ רְשׁוּת לְבַלְבֵּל הָאָדָם בְּדִבְרֵי שֶׁקֶר וּמִרְמָה לְהַרְבּוֹת שְׂכָרוֹ, כְּפִתּוּיֵי הַזּוֹנָה לְבֶן הַמֶּלֶךְ בְּשֶׁקֶר וּמִרְמָה בִּרְשׁוּת הַמֶּלֶךְ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בַּזֹּהַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ.

Translation

From this every person who has doubts about faith come into his mind can learn that they are only the words of the spirit of the sitra achra, which raises itself above his soul. But the Jewish people themselves are “believers …”

What is more, the sitra achra does not itself doubt the faith at all. It was simply granted leave to muddle a person with lies and trickery so that he can earn a larger reward. It is like the parable in the holy Zohar of the harlot who, with the king’s permission, uses lies and trickery to try to lead the prince astray.

Explanation

A doubt in faith is not a sign that the person has lost his faith. It is the empty talk of the sitra achra; the Jew himself believes.

Even the sitra achra at its source has no doubts. It only has permission to confuse, so a person earns more by standing firm, like the woman in chapter 9 whom the king hires to test his son: she plays her part, but hopes he will send her away. (As it is clothed in a person, though, the animal soul really does want him to fall.)

So a doubt is met neither by debate nor by despair. It is named and pushed away. Studying matters of faith is good and important, as its own work.

Sources

The Yesod: The ego is loud, but it is empty

Chapter 29 begins with a heart that feels nothing and ends with a mind full of doubts. They look like two problems, but they have one root: the animal soul has puffed itself up, and its swelling covers the G‑dly soul.

This changes where we look for the answer. When the heart is dull we assume something is missing: more contemplation, more inspiration, more proof. But nothing is missing. The soul is always alight, and every Jew believes. What blocks the fire is the thickness of the wood. So the work is not to add but to take away: to split the log and let the air out of the ego.

That is why the remedies are so direct. Look honestly at the self you naturally live in. Make an owner’s account of your days. And when needed, rage at it: how long will you hide the truth? No new argument is needed, because the ego has nothing of its own. It is darkness, and darkness leaves when the light comes in. The spies did not need a miracle to believe again; they needed their pride broken.

This humbling is done at set times. It is aimed at the sitra achra, not at the person’s worth, and never at anyone else. It is not meant to leave him sad, and the coming chapters show that it leads to joy. The point is not the breaking; the point is that the soul can come out.

For a beinoni this is daily work. The ego will swell again tomorrow. But now he knows what it is, and that it is not his deepest self.

Sources

Points to ponder

  1. When my heart feels dull, do I look for something to add, or for what has swollen up and is blocking what is already there?
  2. Which “I” am I living in today, the one that wants for itself or the soul inside it?
  3. If I made an owner’s account of yesterday, how much of it was for G‑d?
  4. Can I rage at my ego without turning that anger on myself as a person, or on anyone else?
  5. When a doubt comes, do I argue with it or panic over it, instead of naming it as empty words?