תניאTanya Explained

פרק י

Chapter 10: The Tzaddik: Complete and Incomplete

In short

Chapter 10 describes the tzaddik. The incomplete tzaddik has driven the evil out of his heart so fully that he cannot feel it. The complete tzaddik, whose love of G‑d is the love of delights, has turned it into good. These rare “people of ascent” raise the evil up to holiness and serve G‑d only for His sake, and the chapter ends by showing that these two reasons for their name are really one.

1.Driven out, but not transformed

וְהִנֵּה כְּשֶׁהָאָדָם מַגְבִּיר נַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית וְנִלְחָם כָּל כָּךְ עִם הַבַּהֲמִית, עַד שֶׁמְּגָרֵשׁ וּמְבָעֵר הָרַע שֶׁבָּהּ מֵחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "וּבִעַרְתָּ הָרָע מִקִּרְבֶּךָ", וְאֵין הָרַע נֶהְפַּךְ לְטוֹב מַמָּשׁ, נִקְרָא צַדִּיק שֶׁאֵינוֹ גָּמוּר וְצַדִּיק וְרַע לוֹ. דְּהַיְנוּ שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ עֲדַיִן מְעַט מִזְּעֵיר רַע בֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי, אֶלָּא שֶׁכָּפוּף וּבָטֵל לַטּוֹב מֵחֲמַת מִעוּטוֹ, וְלָכֵן נִדְמֶה לוֹ כִּי וַיְּגָרְשֵׁהוּ וַיֵּלַךְ לוֹ כֻּלּוֹ לְגַמְרֵי. אֲבָל בֶּאֱמֶת, אִלּוּ חָלַף וְהָלַךְ לוֹ לְגַמְרֵי כָּל הָרַע שֶׁבּוֹ, הָיָה נֶהְפָּךְ לַטּוֹב מַמָּשׁ.

Translation

Now, when a person strengthens his G‑dly soul and fights the animal soul so hard that he drives out and removes the evil in it from the left chamber [of the heart], as it says, “And you shall remove the evil from your midst,” but the evil is not actually turned into good, he is called “an incomplete tzaddik” (tzaddik she’eino gamur) and “a tzaddik who has bad” (tzaddik v’ra lo). That means there is still a tiny bit of evil in him, in the left chamber, but it is subdued and nullified under the good because it is so small. So it seems to him that “he drove it out and it went away” completely. But in truth, if all the evil in him had really passed and gone away completely, it would have been turned into actual good.

Explanation

Chapters 1 to 9 described the two souls and their battle. Now come the people that battle produces, starting at the top: the tzaddik. The rasha follows in chapter 11, and the beinoni, the book’s real subject, in chapter 12.

This tzaddik has gone further than any beinoni. The beinoni keeps evil out of his thoughts, words and actions. This person has removed it from its home, the left chamber of the heart (chapter 9), reading the verse’s “from your midst” as “from within you”. He no longer wants evil at all.

Yet he is only an “incomplete” tzaddik. A tiny trace of evil is left, so small that the good swallows it up. He is not pretending: he honestly senses nothing, because the trace lies below anything he is aware of. But his conclusion that it is all gone is mistaken. It only “seems to him”.

So how do we know anything is left? The Alter Rebbe gives a test. If the evil had really gone, it would have become good. The next paragraphs explain why.

Sources

2.The complete tzaddik: the filthy garments removed

וּבֵאוּר הָעִנְיָן, כִּי הִנֵּה צַדִּיק גָּמוּר שֶׁנֶּהְפַּךְ הָרַע שֶׁלּוֹ לְטוֹב וְלָכֵן נִקְרָא צַדִּיק וְטוֹב לוֹ, הוּא עַל יְדֵי הֲסָרַת הַבְּגָדִים הַצּוֹאִים לְגַמְרֵי מֵהָרַע. דְּהַיְנוּ לִמְאֹס מְאֹד בְּתַעֲנוּגֵי עוֹלָם הַזֶּה לְהִתְעַנֵּג בָּם בְּתַעֲנוּגוֹת בְּנֵי אָדָם לְמַלֹּאת תַּאֲוֹת הַגּוּף בִּלְבָד וְלֹא לַעֲבוֹדַת ה', מִפְּנֵי הֱיוֹתָם נִמְשָׁכִים וְנִשְׁפָּעִים מֵהַקְּלִפָּה וְסִטְרָא אַחֲרָא, וְכָל מַה שֶּׁהוּא מֵהַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא הַצַּדִּיק הַגָּמוּר הוּא שֹוֹנְאוֹ בְּתַכְלִית הַשִּׂנְאָה, מֵחֲמַת גֹּדֶל אַהֲבָתוֹ לַה' וּקְדֻשָּׁתוֹ בְּאַהֲבָה רַבָּה בַּתַּעֲנוּגִים וְחִבָּה יְתֵרָה הַנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. כִּי הֵם זֶה לְעֻמַּת זֶה, כְּדִכְתִיב: "תַּכְלִית שִׂנְאָה שְׂנֵאתִים לְאֹיְבִים הָיוּ לִי, חָקְרֵנִי וְדַע לְבָבִי" וגו'. וּכְפִי עֶרֶךְ גֹּדֶל הָאַהֲבָה לַה', כָּךְ עֶרֶךְ גֹּדֶל הַשִּׂנְאָה לְסִטְרָא אַחֲרָא וְהַמִּאוּס בָּרַע בְּתַכְלִית. כִּי הַמִּאוּס הוּא הֶפֶךְ הָאַהֲבָה, מַמָּשׁ כְּמוֹ הַשִּׂנְאָה.

Translation

The explanation is this. A complete tzaddik, whose evil has been turned into good, and who is therefore called “a tzaddik who has good” (tzaddik v’tov lo), reached this by removing the “filthy garments” from the evil completely. That means he holds worldly pleasures in total contempt: to enjoy them the way people do, only to satisfy the body’s appetite and not for the service of G‑d. [He despises them] because they are drawn from and flow from the kelipah and sitra achra. And whatever comes from the sitra achra, the complete tzaddik hates with an absolute hatred, because of his great love for G‑d and His holiness, the great love of delights and the extra affection mentioned above. For they are opposites, one facing the other, as it says, “I hate them with the utmost hatred; they have become my enemies. Search me and know my heart….” And as great as the love of G‑d is, so great is the hatred of the sitra achra and the utter disgust with evil, because disgust is the very opposite of love, just as hatred is.

Explanation

To explain the incomplete tzaddik, the Alter Rebbe first describes the complete one. There are two things in the animal soul: its energy, and the “garments” it is dressed in, the bad desires through which it expresses itself. The garments cannot be raised up. They must be taken off and thrown away. Then the energy can be dressed in clean garments and turned toward holiness. That is what “turned into good” means.

Notice exactly what he despises: pleasure taken only to satisfy the body. Pleasure that serves G‑d, such as enjoying Shabbos with food and drink, is holy.

And the hatred is not where he starts. It grows out of love. Because he delights in G‑d (the love of delights of chapter 9), he cannot bear what stands opposite Him. “Search me and know my heart” means: see how much I love You, and You will know how much I hate Your enemies. Toward the sitra achra, the spiritual source, he feels hatred. Toward the physical pleasures it feeds he feels disgust, as one recoils from something filthy.

Sources

3.Why a trace of evil remains

וְצַדִּיק שֶׁאֵינוֹ גָּמוּר הוּא שֶׁאֵינוֹ שֹוֹנֵא הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא בְּתַכְלִית הַשִּׂנְאָה, וְלָכֵן אֵינוֹ מוֹאֵס גַּם כֵּן בָּרַע בְּתַכְלִית.

וְכָל שֶׁאֵין הַשִּׂנְאָה וְהַמִּאוּס בְּתַכְלִית, עַל כָּרְחוֹ נִשְׁאָר אֵיזֶה שֶׁמֶץ אַהֲבָה וְתַעֲנוּג לְשָׁם, וְלֹא הוּסְרוּ הַבְּגָדִים הַצּוֹאִים לְגַמְרֵי מִכֹּל וָכֹל. וְלָכֵן לֹא נֶהְפַּךְ לְטוֹב מַמָּשׁ, מֵאַחַר שֶׁיֵּשׁ לוֹ אֵיזֶה אֲחִיזָה עֲדַיִן בַּבְּגָדִים הַצּוֹאִים, אֶלָּא שֶׁהוּא בָּטֵל בְּמִעוּטוֹ וּכְלָא חָשֵׁיב, וְלָכֵן נִקְרָא צַדִּיק וָרַע כָּפוּף וּבָטֵל לוֹ. וְעַל כֵּן גַּם אַהֲבָתוֹ לַה' אֵינָהּ בְּתַכְלִית, וְלָכֵן נִקְרָא צַדִּיק שֶׁאֵינוֹ גָּמוּר.

Translation

The incomplete tzaddik is one who does not hate the sitra achra with an absolute hatred, and so he also does not find evil utterly disgusting.

And wherever the hatred and disgust are not absolute, some trace of love and pleasure must remain there, and the “filthy garments” have not been taken off completely and entirely. So [the evil] has not actually been turned into good, for it still keeps some grip on the “filthy garments”. Only it is nullified because it is so small, and counts as nothing. That is why he is called “a tzaddik and bad (subdued and nullified) to him.” And therefore his love of G‑d is also not absolute, and so he is called an incomplete tzaddik.

Explanation

The contrast now follows by simple logic. His love of G‑d is very great, but it is not yet complete; it has not reached the full love of delights. So his rejection of evil is real but not total, and where rejection is not total, a speck of attraction must remain. That speck keeps a grip on the filthy garments, and while the garments are on, the energy cannot become good. Still, it is so small that it shows itself in nothing, not even as a desire.

The Alter Rebbe explains the name in the middle of the phrase itself: in “a tzaddik who has bad”, the bad is “to him”, subdued and surrendered to the good in him.

So the two pairs of names say two different things. “Complete” and “incomplete” describe his love of G‑d. “Who has good” and “who has bad” describe what happened to his evil: transformed, or only subdued. They go together, because only the love of delights can strip off the garments and turn the evil into good. Both are true tzaddikim: both love G‑d greatly, and in neither one is any evil felt.

Sources

4.Tens of thousands of levels

וְהִנֵּה מַדְרֵגָה זוֹ מִתְחַלֶּקֶת לְרִבְבוֹת מַדְרֵגוֹת, בְּעִנְיַן בְּחִינַת מִעוּט הָרַע הַנִּשְׁאָר מֵאֶחָד מֵאַרְבָּעָה יְסוֹדוֹת הָרָעִים, וּבְעִנְיַן בִּטּוּלוֹ בְּמִעוּטוֹ בְּשִׁשִּׁים עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל, אוֹ בְּאֶלֶף וּרְבָבָה וְכַיּוֹצֵא עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל. וְהֵן הֵם בְּחִינוֹת צַדִּיקִים הָרַבִּים שֶׁבְּכָל הַדּוֹרוֹת, כִּדְאִיתָא בִּגְמָרָא, דְּתַמְנֵיסַר אַלְפֵי צַדִּיקֵי קַיְּמֵי קַמֵּהּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא.

Translation

Now this level divides into tens of thousands of levels. They differ in the kind of small evil that is left, from which of the four bad elements it comes, and in how far it is nullified by its smallness: whether one part in sixty, in a thousand, in ten thousand, or more. These are the levels of the many tzaddikim in every generation, as the Gemara says, “Before the Holy One, blessed be He, stand eighteen thousand tzaddikim.”

Explanation

Incomplete tzaddikim are not all alike. First, the kind of trace. Chapter 1 traced the animal soul’s bad traits to four elements: fire (anger and pride), water (desire for pleasure), air (frivolity and empty talk) and earth (laziness and sadness). In one tzaddik the hidden trace may come from fire, in another from water.

Second, how deeply it is swallowed up. The words come from the laws of kashrus. A drop of milk falls into a pot of meat. If the meat is sixty times the drop, its taste is gone and the dish is kosher. The drop is still there; you simply cannot taste it. So too the good in one tzaddik may outweigh the evil sixty to one, in another a thousand or ten thousand to one. The Alter Rebbe twice says “for example”: the numbers are illustrations, not fixed lines.

These are true tzaddikim, the many found in every generation. Yet all of them belong to the incomplete level.

Sources

5.The few “people of ascent”: darkness into light

אַךְ עַל מַעֲלַת צַדִּיק גָּמוּר הוּא שֶׁאָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר יוֹחָאי: רָאִיתִי בְּנֵי עֲלִיָּה וְהֵם מוּעָטִים כו', שֶׁלָּכֵן נִקְרָאִים בְּנֵי עֲלִיָּה, שֶׁמְּהַפְּכִין הָרַע וּמַעֲלִים אוֹתוֹ לִקְדֻשָּׁה, כִּדְאִיתָא בַּזֹּהַר בַּהַקְדָּמָה, שֶׁכְּשֶׁרָצָה רַבִּי חִיָּיא לַעֲלוֹת לְהֵיכַל רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחָאי, שְׁמַע קָלָא נָפֵיק וְאָמַר: מַאן מִנְּכוֹן דִּי חֲשׁוֹכָא מְהַפְּכָן לִנְהוֹרָא וְטָעֲמִין מְרִירוּ לְמִתְקָא עַד לָא יֵיתוּן הָכָא וכו'.

Translation

But about the high level of the complete tzaddik, Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai declared, “I have beheld bnei aliyah (people of ascent), and they are few….” They are called “people of ascent” because they turn the evil around and raise it up to holiness, as it says in the Zohar, in the Introduction: when Rabbi Chiya wanted to go up to the heavenly chamber of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, a voice rang out and asked, “Who among you made darkness into light and bitterness into sweet before you came here? …” [Only such people may enter.]

Explanation

Incomplete tzaddikim are many. The complete tzaddik is rare: Rabbi Shimon saw only a few.

The name explains what makes him different. He is a person of “ascent” because he lifts something up: the evil itself. The incomplete tzaddik has driven the evil out, and what is left is a trace swallowed up in the good. The complete tzaddik has raised the animal soul’s energy itself into holiness.

The Zohar’s two pairs say the same thing. The darkness of the world, which hides G‑d, is turned into light. The bitter taste of the animal soul and the evil inclination is turned into sweetness. To enter Rabbi Shimon’s chamber it is not enough to have pushed the darkness away. It has to have become light.

Sources

6.Serving G‑d for His sake alone

וְעוֹד נִקְרָאִים בְּנֵי עֲלִיָּה, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁגַּם עֲבוֹדָתָם בִּבְחִינַת וַעֲשֵׂה טוֹב בְּקִיּוּם הַתּוֹרָה וּמִצְוֹתֶיהָ הוּא לְצֹרֶךְ גָּבוֹהַּ וּמַעְלָה מַעְלָה עַד רוּם הַמַּעֲלוֹת, וְלֹא כְּדֵי לְדָבְקָה בוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ בִּלְבָד לְרַוּוֹת צִמְאוֹן נַפְשָׁם הַצְּמֵאָה לַה', כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב: "הוֹי כָּל צָמֵא לְכוּ לַמַּיִם", וּכְמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּמָקוֹם אַחֵר. אֶלָּא כִּדְפֵרְשׁוּ בַּתִּקּוּנִים: אֵיזֶהוּ חָסִיד, הַמִּתְחַסֵּד עִם קוֹנוֹ, עִם קַן דִּילֵהּ, לְיַחֲדָא קֻדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא וּשְׁכִינְתֵּהּ בַּתַּחְתּוֹנִים. וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בְּרַעְיָא מְהֵימְנָא פָּרָשַׁת תֵּצֵא: כִּבְרָא דְּאִשְׁתַּדַּל בָּתַר אֲבוֹי וְאִמֵּהּ דְּרָחֵים לוֹן יַתִּיר מִגַּרְמֵיהּ וְנַפְשֵׁיהּ וְרוּחֵיהּ וְנִשְׁמְתֵיהּ כו', וּמָסַר גַּרְמֵיהּ לְמִיתָה עֲלַיְהוּ לְמִפְרַק לוֹן כו', וּכְמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּמָקוֹם אַחֵר.

Translation

They are also called people of ascent for another reason: even their service in “do good”, in keeping the Torah and its mitzvos, is for the sake of the One Above, higher and higher, to the loftiest heights. It is not only in order to cleave to Him, to quench their soul’s thirst for G‑d, as it says, “Ho, everyone who is thirsty, go to the water,” as is explained elsewhere. Rather, it is as the Tikkunim explain: “Who is a chassid? One who is kind to his Maker (kono)”, [read as] “to His nest (kan dilei)”: to unite the Holy One, blessed be He, and His Shechinah in the lower realms. And as it says in the Raya Mehemna on Parshas Teitzei: “As a son who toils for his father and mother, dearer to him than his own body, nefesh, ruach and neshamah…, and gives himself up to death for them, to redeem them….” And as is explained elsewhere.

Explanation

The second reason is about the good they do. Most people who serve G‑d sincerely do it because the soul thirsts for Him, and Torah and mitzvos truly quench that thirst: the prophet sends those who thirst for G‑d to the “water” of Torah. That is a great level. Yet in a subtle way it is still for oneself. The reward sought is spiritual, the joy of being close to G‑d.

The people of ascent do not serve for themselves at all, not even for their G‑dly selves. They want only that the Holy One, as He is beyond the world, be united with His Shechinah, His presence within it, here in the lowest realm. That is the “kindness” the chassid does for his Maker.

The Raya Mehemna’s picture makes it sharper. A son who gives his life to free his captive parents gains nothing for himself. His love for them goes beyond his body and beyond his own soul. So too the people of ascent: their whole concern is G‑d, not themselves.

Sources

7.Both reasons are one

[וּשְׁנֵיהֶם עוֹלִים בְּקָנֶה אֶחָד, כִּי עַל יְדֵי הַבֵּרוּרִים שֶׁמְּבָרְרִים מִנֹּגַהּ מַעֲלִים מַיִין נֻקְבִּין, וְנַעֲשִׂים יִחוּדִים עֶלְיוֹנִים לְהוֹרִיד מַיִין דְּכוּרִין, שֶׁהֵם הֵם מֵימֵי הַחֲסָדִים שֶׁבְּכָל מִצְוָה וּמִצְוָה מֵרַמַ"ח מִצְוֹת עֲשֵׂה, שֶׁכֻּלָּן הֵן בְּחִינוֹת חֲסָדִים וּמַיִין דְּכוּרִין, דְּהַיְנוּ הַמְשָׁכַת קְדֻשַּׁת אֱלֹהוּתוֹ יִתְבָּרֵךְ מִלְּמַעְלָה לְמַטָּה לְהִתְלַבֵּשׁ בַּתַּחְתּוֹנִים, כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֵר בְּמָקוֹם אַחֵר].

Translation

[And both reasons go up on one stalk. For through the refinements (beirurim) that are refined out of nogah, “feminine waters” (mayin nukvin) are raised, and supernal unions take place, to bring down “masculine waters” (mayin duchrin). These are the waters of kindness in each and every one of the 248 positive mitzvos, all of which are kindness and “masculine waters”, that is, the drawing down of the holiness of His G‑dliness from above to below, to be clothed in the lower realms, as is explained elsewhere.]

Explanation

The chapter ends with a passage the Alter Rebbe himself set apart in parentheses: the two reasons are really one. In Kabbalah, “feminine” means the one who receives and “masculine” the one who gives. “Feminine waters” rise from below, from man’s effort. “Masculine waters” are G‑d’s kindness flowing down in answer.

Raising the evil to holiness is the work from below. The animal soul comes from kelipas nogah, the “glowing shell” of chapter 1 that has good mixed into it, and refining that good rises as feminine waters. That brings about a union above, and G‑d’s kindness flows down through every positive mitzvah. That is exactly the second reason: bringing G‑d into the lowest world.

So the complete tzaddik does not have two jobs. He wants only that G‑d dwell below, and the way that happens is by lifting up his own animal soul. (Of the two reasons, the first fits the name “a tzaddik who has good”, and the second fits the name “complete tzaddik”.)

Sources

The Yesod: Silenced or transformed, and what makes the difference

Chapter 10 draws a line that is easy to miss. Keeping evil out of what we think, say and do is the beinoni’s victory. Driving it out of the heart is the tzaddik’s. And even among tzaddikim there is one more step: evil can be silenced, or it can be transformed. The incomplete tzaddik has silenced it so completely that he feels nothing. The complete tzaddik has turned it into good.

The key is the difference between the animal soul’s energy and its garments. The drive to want, to enjoy and to live with intensity is not in itself the enemy. What has to go are the outlets it has been dressed in, the cravings for pleasure for its own sake. Those must be stripped off and thrown away. Then the energy can be dressed in clean garments and become a force for holiness.

What strips the garments is not, in the end, a fight. It is love. Hatred of evil, the Alter Rebbe says, grows exactly as large as the love of G‑d. A person who delights in G‑d is repelled by what stands against Him, the way one turns from something filthy. The incomplete tzaddik loves G‑d so greatly that evil has lost its voice in him. Only the love of delights in its fullness removes the last speck of attraction. So where a person stands is measured not only by how hard he fights, but by what he loves.

Then the chapter raises the bar again. Even the purest thirst for G‑d can, in a subtle way, be about me: my closeness, my spiritual joy. The people of ascent serve like a son who gives his life to free his parents, wanting only that G‑d be at home in this lowest world. And the closing passage shows this is the same achievement: the evil lifted up from below is what brings G‑d’s kindness down.

Few will reach this level: chapter 14 will explain that not every soul can become a tzaddik. But the chapter still speaks to the beinoni, the reader of this book. It teaches him not to treat his drives as enemies to crush, but as energy waiting for clean garments. It teaches him that the way to weaken evil is to deepen love. And it invites him to make small places in his life where he does something only because G‑d wants it, not for what he will feel.

Sources

Points to ponder

  1. Which of my drives do I treat as an enemy to crush, when the problem may only be the garment it is wearing? What clean garment could it wear?
  2. The complete tzaddik rejects evil because he loves, not because he fights. What would change if I put more into loving G‑d than into fighting myself?
  3. Is there a desire I think I have “driven out” that may only have gone quiet?
  4. When I learn or daven, how much is for my own spiritual feeling, and how much simply because G‑d wants it?
  5. Where in my day could I make one small place for doing something only for His sake?