תניאTanya Explained

פרק טו

Chapter 15: One Who Serves and One Who Does Not

In short

A verse in Malachi speaks of “one who serves G‑d” and “one who does not serve Him”, and the Gemara says both are righteous. The Alter Rebbe explains that both are beinonim who never sin. What makes one of them “serve” is a fight: going beyond what his nature and habits already do.

1.“Serves” and “servant”

וּבָזֶה יוּבָן מַה שֶּׁכָּתוּב: "וְשַׁבְתֶּם וּרְאִיתֶם בֵּין צַדִּיק לָרָשָׁע בֵּין עֹבֵד אֱלֹהִים לַאֲשֶׁר לֹא עֲבָדוֹ".

שֶׁהַהֶפְרֵשׁ בֵּין עוֹבֵד אֱלֹהִים לְצַדִּיק הוּא, שֶׁ"עוֹבֵד" הוּא לְשׁוֹן הֹוֶה, שֶׁהוּא בְּאֶמְצַע הָעֲבוֹדָה, שֶׁהִיא הַמִּלְחָמָה עִם הַיֵּצֶר הָרַע לְהִתְגַּבֵּר עָלָיו וּלְגָרְשׁוֹ מֵהָעִיר קְטַנָּה, שֶׁלֹּא יִתְלַבֵּשׁ בְּאֵבְרֵי הַגּוּף, שֶׁהוּא בֶּאֱמֶת עֲבוֹדָה וְעָמָל גָּדוֹל לְהִלָּחֵם בּוֹ תָּמִיד, וְהַיְנוּ הַבֵּינוֹנִי.

אֲבָל הַצַּדִּיק נִקְרָא "עֶבֶד ה'" בְּשֵׁם הַתֹּאַר, כְּמוֹ שֵׁם "חָכָם" אוֹ "מֶלֶךְ", שֶׁכְּבָר נַעֲשָׂה חָכָם אוֹ מֶלֶךְ; כָּךְ זֶה, כְּבָר עָבַד וְגָמַר לְגַמְרֵי עֲבוֹדַת הַמִּלְחָמָה עִם הָרַע, עַד כִּי וַיְּגָרְשֵׁהוּ וַיֵּלֶךְ לוֹ, וְלִבּוֹ חָלָל בְּקִרְבּוֹ.

Translation

With this we can understand the verse (Malachi 3:18): “Then you will again see the difference between the tzaddik and the rasha, between one who serves G‑d and one who does not serve Him.”

The difference between “one who serves G‑d” (oved Elokim) and a tzaddik is this. “Oved” is in the present tense: he is in the middle of the work. That work is the war with the evil inclination, to overpower it and drive it out of the “small city” [the body], so that it does not dress itself in the limbs of the body. To fight it constantly truly takes great work and toil. This is the beinoni.

The tzaddik, by contrast, bears the name “servant of G‑d” (eved Hashem). It is a title, much as “sage” or “king” is a title bestowed on someone who has already become a sage or a king. In the same way, this person has already carried out and fully completed the labor of battling evil, to the point where “he expelled it and it departed”, and “his heart is emptied inside him” (see chapter 1).

Explanation

Having described the tzaddik and the beinoni, the Alter Rebbe uses the distinction to read a verse. The verse seems to say the same thing twice: surely the tzaddik is the one who serves G‑d, and the rasha the one who does not. The Gemara answers that “one who does not serve Him” is no rasha. Both he and “one who serves” are righteous, and the difference is that one reviews his learning a hundred times and the other a hundred and one. That still leaves “tzaddik” and “one who serves G‑d” looking like the same person.

The answer is in the grammar. Oved, “serves”, describes an activity still going on. The beinoni fights every day to keep the animal soul out of his thought, speech and action, and the Alter Rebbe says plainly that this is hard work. Eved, “servant”, is a title describing what a person has become, like “sage” or “king”. That is the tzaddik: his war is over, the evil is gone, and the seat of evil in his heart is empty.

So the verse’s four terms describe three kinds of people: the tzaddik, the rasha, and the beinoni, who comes in two levels. Neither kind of beinoni ever sins, and in that sense the Gemara can call both of them righteous.

Sources

2.The beinoni who “does not serve”

וּבַבֵּינוֹנִי יֵשׁ גַּם כֵּן שְׁתֵּי מַדְרֵגוֹת: עוֹבֵד אֱלֹהִים, וַאֲשֶׁר לֹא עֲבָדוֹ. וְאַף עַל פִּי כֵן אֵינוֹ רָשָׁע, כִּי לֹא עָבַר מִיָּמָיו שׁוּם עֲבֵרָה קַלָּה, וְגַם קִיֵּם כָּל הַמִּצְווֹת שֶׁאֶפְשָׁר לוֹ לְקַיְּמָן, וְתַלְמוּד תּוֹרָה כְּנֶגֶד כֻּלָּם, וְלֹא פָּסֵיק פֻּמֵהּ מִגִּירְסָא.

Translation

Within the beinoni too there are two levels: “one who serves G‑d” and “one who does not serve Him.” Even so, [the second] is not a rasha. For he has never in his life committed even a minor sin. He has also kept all the mitzvos he was able to keep, including Torah study, which equals them all, and “his mouth never stopped from learning.”

Explanation

Even the beinoni “who does not serve” is no rasha. He has never committed even a minor sin, he keeps every mitzvah he can, and he learns Torah whenever he is free. That last point alone is a high bar: chapter 1 showed that anyone who could learn Torah and does not is called a rasha. In what he does, he is flawless. What he lacks is not in his deeds but in how they come about.

Sources

3.When the animal soul is quiet

אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה שׁוּם מִלְחָמָה עִם הַיֵּצֶר, לְנַצְּחוֹ עַל יְדֵי אוֹר ה' הַמֵּאִיר עַל נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית שֶׁבַּמֹּחַ, הַשַּׁלִּיט עַל הַלֵּב כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאֵין יִצְרוֹ עוֹמֵד לְנֶגְדּוֹ כְּלָל לְבַטְּלוֹ מִתּוֹרָתוֹ וַעֲבוֹדָתוֹ, וְאֵין צָרִיךְ לִלְחֹם עִמּוֹ כְּלָל, כְּגוֹן שֶׁהוּא מַתְמִיד בְּלִמּוּדוֹ בְּטִבְעוֹ מִתּוֹלַדְתּוֹ עַל יְדֵי תִּגְבֹּרֶת הַמָּרָה שְׁחוֹרָה. וְכֵן אֵין לוֹ מִלְחָמָה מִתַּאֲוַת נָשִׁים, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא מְצֻנָּן בְּטִבְעוֹ, וְכֵן בִּשְׁאָר תַּעֲנוּגֵי עוֹלָם הַזֶּה, הוּא מְחֻסַּר הֶרְגֵּשׁ הֲנָאָה בְּטִבְעוֹ.

וְלָכֵן אֵין צָרִיךְ לְהִתְבּוֹנֵן כָּל כָּךְ בִּגְדֻלַּת ה', לְהוֹלִיד מִבִּינָתוֹ רוּחַ דַּעַת וְיִרְאַת ה' בְּמֹחוֹ, לְהִשָּׁמֵר שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲבֹר עַל מִצְוֹת לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה, וְאַהֲבַת ה' בְּלִבּוֹ, לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ בְּקִיּוּם הַמִּצְוֹת, וְתַלְמוּד תּוֹרָה כְּנֶגֶד כֻּלָּן. אֶלָּא דַּי לוֹ בְּאַהֲבָה מְסֻתֶּרֶת אֲשֶׁר בְּלֵב כְּלָלוּת יִשְׂרָאֵל, שֶׁנִּקְרְאוּ אוֹהֲבֵי שְׁמוֹ.

וְלָכֵן אֵינוֹ נִקְרָא 'עוֹבֵד' כְּלָל, כִּי אַהֲבָה זוֹ הַמְּסֻתֶּרֶת אֵינָהּ פְּעֻלָּתוֹ וַעֲבוֹדָתוֹ כְּלָל, אֶלָּא הִיא יְרֻשָּׁתֵנוּ מֵאֲבוֹתֵינוּ לִכְלַל יִשְׂרָאֵל, וּכְמוֹ שֶׁיִּתְבָּאֵר לְקַמָּן.

Translation

The only point is that he fights no battle against the evil inclination in order to overcome it with G‑d’s light illuminating the G‑dly soul in the brain, which governs the heart, as described earlier (chapters 12–13). For his inclination puts up no resistance whatsoever to draw him away from Torah study and divine service [in prayer], so he never has to struggle with it. Say, for example, that he is a diligent learner by temperament from birth, owing to a strong “black bile” [a heavy, settled disposition]. Similarly, desire for women poses no struggle for him, since his nature is cold. The same applies to other worldly pleasures: his nature simply does not register the enjoyment.

He therefore has little need to dwell on G‑d’s greatness in order to draw out of his understanding a spirit of knowledge and awe of G‑d in his mind, which would keep him from violating the prohibitions, and, in his heart, a love of G‑d that would join him to G‑d through observing the mitzvos and studying Torah, which outweighs them all. The concealed love found in every Jewish heart is sufficient for him, since Jews are called “lovers of His name” (Tehillim 69:37).

Therefore he is not called “one who serves” at all. For this hidden love is not his doing or his work at all. It is our inheritance from our fathers to all of Israel, as will be explained later (chapters 18, 19 and 44).

Explanation

Why then is he “not serving”? Because there is no fight. The beinoni of chapters 12 and 13 wins by the light of G‑d shining in the G‑dly soul in the mind, which rules the heart. This man never needs it, because his animal soul does not object. The examples are all about temperament: a heavy, settled nature that is happy to sit and learn all day, a cool nature untroubled by desire, a person who simply does not feel much pleasure in worldly things. His animal soul has not become holy. It is just quiet.

So he does not need to meditate on G‑d’s greatness to produce fear of G‑d, which keeps a person from sin, or love of G‑d, which moves him to mitzvos and Torah. The hidden love every Jew has is enough for him, together with his easy temperament.

And that love is not his achievement. It is an inheritance from the Avos to every Jew, a gift that chapters 18 and 19 will explain. Living on a gift you were given is not yet service. That is why he is “not called one who serves at all”.

Sources

4.Second nature

וְכֵן אַף מִי שֶׁאֵינוֹ מַתְמִיד בְּלִמּוּדוֹ בְּטִבְעוֹ, רַק שֶׁהִרְגִּיל עַצְמוֹ לִלְמֹד בְּהַתְמָדָה גְּדוֹלָה, וְנַעֲשָׂה הַהֶרְגֵּל לוֹ טֶבַע שֵׁנִי, דַּי לוֹ בְּאַהֲבָה מְסֻתֶּרֶת זוֹ, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן רוֹצֶה לִלְמֹד יוֹתֵר מֵרְגִילוּתוֹ.

Translation

So too someone who is not diligent in learning by nature, but has trained himself to learn with great diligence until the habit has become second nature to him: this hidden love is enough for him, unless he wants to learn more than his habit.

Explanation

Now a much wider group. A person who is not studious by nature trains himself to learn diligently, until the habit becomes second nature. Getting there took real effort. But once the habit is set, the hidden love is enough for him too, and he is among those who “do not serve”, unless he wants to learn more than his habit.

A mashal: lifting a heavy rock onto a roof takes great effort. Once it is up there, keeping it there takes none. Effort is needed again only to raise it higher. A good habit is the rock on the roof. It is valuable, but it is no longer service. Service is whatever lifts it higher.

Sources

5.The hundred-and-first time

וּבָזֶה יוּבָן מַה שֶּׁכָּתוּב בִּגְמָרָא, דְּ"עוֹבֵד אֱלֹהִים" הַיְנוּ מִי שֶׁשּׁוֹנֶה פִּרְקוֹ מֵאָה פְּעָמִים וְאֶחָד, וְ"לֹא עֲבָדוֹ" הַיְינוּ מִי שֶׁשּׁוֹנֶה פִּרְקוֹ מֵאָה פְּעָמִים לְבַד.

וְהַיְנוּ מִשּׁוּם שֶׁבִּימֵיהֶם הָיָה הָרְגִילוּת לִשְׁנוֹת כָּל פֶּרֶק מֵאָה פְּעָמִים, כִּדְאִיתָא הָתָם בִּגְמָרָא מָשָׁל מִשּׁוּק שֶׁל חַמָּרִים, שֶׁנִּשְׂכָּרִים לְעֶשֶׂר פְּרָסֵי בְּזוּזָא וּלְאַחַד עָשָׂר פְּרָסֵי בִּתְרֵי זוּזֵי, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא יוֹתֵר מֵרְגִילוּתָם. וְלָכֵן זֹאת הַפַּעַם הַמֵּאָה וְאַחַת הַיְּתֵרָה עַל הָרְגִילוּת שֶׁהֻרְגַּל מִנְּעוּרָיו שְׁקוּלָה כְּנֶגֶד כֻּלָּן, וְעוֹלָה עַל גַּבֵּיהֶן בְּיֶתֶר שְׂאֵת וְיֶתֶר עָז לִהְיוֹת נִקְרָא עוֹבֵד אֱלֹהִים. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁכְּדֵי לְשַׁנּוֹת טֶבַע הָרְגִילוּת, צָרִיךְ לְעוֹרֵר אֶת הָאַהֲבָה לַה', עַל יְדֵי שֶׁמִּתְבּוֹנֵן בִּגְדֻלַּת ה' בְּמֹחוֹ לִשְׁלֹט עַל הַטֶּבַע שֶׁבֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי הַמָּלֵא דַּם הַנֶּפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית שֶׁמֵּהַקְּלִפָּה, שֶׁמִמֶּנָּה הוּא הַטֶּבַע. וְזוֹ הִיא עֲבוֹדָה תַּמָּה לַבֵּינוֹנִי.

Translation

This explains what the Gemara says (Chagigah 9b): “one who serves G‑d” means one who reviews his lesson a hundred and one times, and “one who does not serve Him” means one who reviews his lesson only a hundred times.

The explanation is that in those days people customarily went over each lesson a hundred times. The Gemara there draws an analogy from the donkey drivers’ market: they would hire themselves out to travel ten parsah (Persian miles) for a single zuz, yet for eleven parsah they asked two zuz, since that exceeded their usual practice. Likewise, this hundred-and-first review, which goes past the routine he has followed since he was young, outweighs all the rest put together and surpasses them “in strength and in power”, and earns him the title “one who serves G‑d.” For overcoming the nature formed by habit requires him to awaken a love of G‑d through contemplating G‑d’s greatness in his mind, so as to master the nature seated in the left side [of the heart], which brims with the blood of the animal soul deriving from kelipah, the source of that nature. For a beinoni, this counts as complete service (avodah tamah).

Explanation

This explains the Gemara’s strange measure. Before the Oral Torah was written down, every lesson was reviewed a hundred times. That was simply what a student did. So the first hundred reviews were habit, and the hundred-and-first was the first that went against habit.

The donkey drivers show it. Their usual route was ten parsah for one zuz. For eleven they charged two: the one extra parsah cost as much as the first ten, because it went beyond what they were used to. So too the extra review equals all hundred and even surpasses them, because it is the only one that took a fight.

Why is it a fight? Because habit becomes nature, and nature is lodged in the heart’s left side, the seat of the animal soul, which stems from kelipah. To change it a person must contemplate G‑d’s greatness until a real love of G‑d is aroused, a love stronger than his habit. For a beinoni, that is what complete service means. By the same logic, once a hundred and one becomes the habit, the service is the hundred-and-second.

Sources

6.No service without a fight

אוֹ לְעוֹרֵר אֶת הָאַהֲבָה הַמְּסֻתֶּרֶת שֶׁבְּלִבּוֹ לִמְשֹׁל עַל יָדָהּ עַל הַטֶּבַע שֶׁבֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי, שֶׁזּוֹ נִקְרָא גַּם כֵּן עֲבוֹדָה, לְהִלָּחֵם עִם הַטֶּבַע וְהַיֵּצֶר עַל יְדֵי שֶׁמְּעוֹרֵר הָאַהֲבָה הַמְּסֻתֶּרֶת בְּלִבּוֹ.

מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן כְּשֶׁאֵין לוֹ מִלְחָמָה כְּלָל, אֵין אַהֲבָה זוֹ מִצַּד עַצְמָהּ נִקְרֵאת עֲבוֹדָתוֹ כְּלָל.

Translation

Or he must arouse the hidden love in his heart, and through it rule over the nature in the left chamber [keeping it in check without changing it]. For this too is called service: to fight the nature and the inclination by arousing the hidden love in his heart.

But when he has no war at all, this love in itself is not called his service at all.

Explanation

There is a second way. Instead of building a new love through contemplation, a person can wake up the hidden love he already has and use it to hold his nature in check. It does not change his nature; it only rules it. Only the first way is called “complete service”, but this one still counts as service, because it is a fight. How to wake that love is the subject of chapters 18 and on.

The last line sets the rule. Without a fight, even this love is not counted as his service. The love is real, and he does use it: even a born scholar still prefers his comforts to learning without a break, and the hidden love is what keeps him at it. But a gift that is never put to the test is not yet service. To be called “one who serves G‑d”, a person has to meet resistance and push past it.

Sources

The Yesod: Service begins where your nature ends

Chapter 15 changes how service is measured. We usually measure by amount: how much a person learns, gives and prays. Here two people do exactly the same. Neither ever sins, both keep every mitzvah, both learn at every free moment. Yet one is called “one who serves G‑d” and the other is not. What divides them is not what they did, but what it cost them.

Avodah is the effort to go past what comes naturally. Whatever my temperament or my habits already produce is, in this sense, nature at work. Good habits are precious and must be built, often with great effort, and the deeds they produce keep their worth. But once a good deed becomes easy, it no longer makes a person “one who serves”. The hundred reviews are beautiful, and the hundred-and-first is worth them all, because it is the one where a person chose G‑d over his own nature.

This does not make the hundred worthless. In knowledge and refinement, the one who reviewed a hundred times is far ahead, and he is the one to ask. The verse itself holds two measures. “Tzaddik” and “rasha” describe who a person is. “Serves” and “does not serve” describe what he is doing now. A person can be very refined and not serving, or far less refined and serving, at the moment he pushes past himself.

So the measure is personal. For one person the hundredth review is natural; for another the third is a battle. No one can judge his avodah by comparing himself with others, and no one is ever finished: by the same logic, every level has its hundred-and-first.

Why does the fight count for so much? Because going against nature needs something stronger than nature: a real love of G‑d, either built through contemplation or woken from the hidden love every Jew inherited. A person fights only for what truly matters to him. Stepping beyond habit shows that G‑d is real to him, and not just a comfortable part of his routine.

This is what “be a tzaddik” means for a beinoni. He may never reach the tzaddik’s level, but he keeps reaching, and the reaching is his service. The resistance of his animal soul is not only his problem; it is what makes that service possible. And the practical step is small: no dramatic change, just one step beyond what is comfortable today, and when that becomes comfortable, one more.

Sources

Points to ponder

  1. Which of my good habits now run on their own? Where would the hundred-and-first time be for me?
  2. Which mitzvah comes easily to me because of my temperament, and which one costs me a real fight?
  3. When I compare myself with someone who does more, do I remember that the measure is the effort, not the amount?
  4. The hidden love is a gift from the Avos. When did I last wake it up to win a fight, and not only to keep going?
  5. What one small step beyond my comfort can I take this week, without waiting for a dramatic change?