פרק לח
Chapter 38: A Body and a Soul for Every Mitzvah
Speaking the words of a mitzvah without concentration still fulfills it, while concentration without words does not, because the purpose of the mitzvos is to refine the body and the animal soul. Even so, the Sages compare a mitzvah done with no kavanah to “a body with no soul.” The Alter Rebbe explains what this means: G‑d’s will is fully present in the deed itself, and kavanah lets far more of it shine, at one of two levels.
1.Words count more than thoughts
וְהִנֵּה עִם כָּל הַנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל, יוּבַן הֵיטֵב פְּסַק הַהֲלָכָה הָעֲרוּכָה בַּתַּלְמוּד וּפוֹסְקִים דְּהִרְהוּר לָאו כְּדִבּוּר דָּמֵי, וְאִם קָרָא קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע בְּמַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ וּבְלִבּוֹ לְבַד בְּכָל כֹּחַ כַּוָּנָתוֹ, לֹא יָצָא יְדֵי חוֹבָתוֹ, וְצָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וְלִקְרוֹת. וְכֵן בְּבִרְכַּת הַמָּזוֹן דְּאוֹרַיְתָא, וּבִשְׁאָר בְּרָכוֹת דְּרַבָּנָן וּבַּתְּפִלָּה. וְאִם הוֹצִיא בִּשְׂפָתָיו וְלֹא כִּוֵּן לִבּוֹ, יָצָא יְדֵי חוֹבָתוֹ בְּדִיעֲבַד וְאֵין צָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר, לְבַד מִפָּסוּק רִאשׁוֹן שֶׁל קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע וּבְרָכָה רִאשׁוֹנָה שֶׁל תְּפִלַּת שְׁמוֹנֶה עֶשְׂרֵה, וְכִדְאִיתָא [בְּרֵישׁ פרק ב' דִּבְרָכוֹת]: עַד כָּאן מִצְוַת כַּוָּנָה; מִכָּאן וְאֵילָךְ מִצְוַת קְרִיאָה וכו'.
Everything said so far makes plain the reason behind the law, set down in the Talmud and the codes, that “thought does not count as speech” (Berachos 20b). If a person said the Shema silently, in thought and feeling alone, however intensely he concentrated, has not discharged his duty and has to say it again. The same goes for Grace after Meals, a Torah obligation, for the other blessings, which are rabbinic, and for prayer. Whereas if his lips formed the words while his heart wandered, his duty is done after the fact and he need not say them over, apart from the opening verse of the Shema and the first blessing of the Amidah. So the second chapter of Berachos opens: “Concentration is required up to this point; beyond it, what is required is reciting” (Berachos 13b), and so on.
The question is not why the words must be said; G‑d may command speech as He commands deeds of the hands. The question is the imbalance. The heart of the Shema is accepting G‑d as King, and the heart of the Grace after Meals is thanks, and G‑d knows our thoughts. So why do words with a wandering mind count, while full concentration without words counts for nothing?
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #98 (ch. 37d) — 43:55, 46:59, 48:00, 49:06, 51:06, 53:09
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 1 — 03:01, 04:31, 06:03, 07:33
2.Why the words matter most
וְהַיְנוּ מִשּׁוּם שֶׁהַנְּשָׁמָה אֵינָהּ צְרִיכָה תִּקּוּן לְעַצְמָהּ בְּמִצְווֹת, רַק לְהַמְשִׁיךְ אוֹר, לְתַקֵּן נֶפֶשׁ הַחִיּוּנִית וְהַגּוּף, עַל יְדֵי אוֹתִיּוֹת הַדִּבּוּר שֶׁהַנֶּפֶשׁ מְדַבֶּרֶת בַּחֲמֵשֶׁת מוֹצָאוֹת הַפֶּה. וְכֵן בְּמִצְווֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת שֶׁהַנֶּפֶשׁ עוֹשָׂה בִּשְׁאָר אֵבָרֵי הַגּוּף.
The reason: the neshamah, the G‑dly soul, has nothing of its own to repair through the mitzvos. Its only task is to bring down light that repairs the animating soul and the body. It does so through the letters it pronounces with the mouth’s five organs of speech, and equally through the practical mitzvos it carries out with the body’s other limbs.
This sums up chapters 35–37. The G‑dly soul lacks nothing; it came down to refine the animal soul and the body, and through them the world. Thought alone belongs to the G‑dly soul. Speech uses the throat, palate, tongue, teeth and lips, the body itself. So speech without the heart has done the main work, and the heart without speech has not. This closes the discussion begun in chapter 35, which also shows the worth of the beinoni, whose service lies above all in what he does and says.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #98 (ch. 37d) — 54:09, 58:13, 1:00:16, 1:01:19, 1:04:22
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 1 — 15:09, 16:41, 28:52
3.“Like a body without a soul”
אַךְ אַף עַל פִּי כֵן אָמְרוּ: תְּפִלָּה אוֹ שְׁאָר בְּרָכָה בְּלֹא כַּוָּנָה, הֵן כְּגוּף בְּלֹא נְשָׁמָה. פֵּרוּשׁ, כִּי כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּל הַבְּרוּאִים שֶׁבָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה, שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהֶם גּוּף וּנְשָׁמָה, שֶׁהֵם נֶפֶשׁ כָּל חַי וְרוּחַ כָּל בְּשַׂר אִישׁ, וְנִשְׁמַת כָּל אֲשֶׁר רוּחַ חַיִּים בְּאַפָּיו מִכָּל בַּעֲלֵי חַיִּים, וַה' מְחַיֶּה אֶת כֻּלָּם, וּמְהַוֶּה אוֹתָם מֵאַיִן לְיֵשׁ תָּמִיד בְּאוֹר וְחִיּוּת שֶׁמַּשְׁפִּיע בָּהֶם. שֶׁגַּם הַגּוּף הַחָמְרִי, וַאֲפִלּוּ אֲבָנִים וְעָפָר הַדּוֹמֵם מַמָּשׁ, יֵשׁ בּוֹ אוֹר וְחִיּוּת מִמֶּנּוּ יִתְבָּרַךְ, שֶׁלֹּא יַחֲזֹר לִהְיוֹת אַיִן וְאֶפֶס כְּשֶׁהָיָה. וְאַף עַל פִּי כֵן אֵין עֵרֶךְ וְדִמְיוֹן כְּלָל בֵּין בְּחִינַת אוֹר וְחִיּוּת הַמֵּאִיר בַּגּוּף, לְגַבֵּי בְּחִינַת אוֹר וְחִיּוּת הַמֵּאִיר בַּנְּשָׁמָה, שֶׁהִיא נֶפֶשׁ כָּל חַי.
Still, the Sages taught: “Prayer, or any blessing, said with no kavanah resembles a body that has no soul” (cf. Shelah, Shaar HaOsiyos). What this means: every creature in this world consists of a body and a soul, as in “in His hand is the soul of all that lives and the spirit of every human body” (Job 12:10), and “all in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life” (Genesis 7:22). G‑d “sustains them all” (Nehemiah 9:6), calling them into existence from nothing without pause by the light and vitality He gives them. Even the physical body, even stones and soil that are entirely lifeless, carry light and vitality from Him that keep them from lapsing back into the nothingness they came from. All the same, the light and vitality glowing in the body cannot be likened or compared in any way to the light and vitality glowing in the soul, the soul of every living thing.
Now the other side. Kavanah here means the intention behind a mitzvah: to be united with G‑d, Whose will it is. Read literally, “a body without a soul” is a corpse. That cannot be meant, since every mitzvah is G‑d’s will and joins a person to Him. So the Alter Rebbe first looks at what a body and a soul are.
The “soul” here is the life of animals and of a person’s body and mind, not the G‑dly soul. Body and soul both exist only because G‑d creates them at every moment, yet their life cannot be compared.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #99 (ch. 38a) — 04:06, 09:14, 13:16, 15:17, 19:23
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 1 — 33:28, 36:30, 54:59
4.Equally hidden, not equally present
וְאַף שֶׁבִּשְׁנֵיהֶם אוֹר אֶחָד שָׁוֶה, בִּבְחִינַת הֶסְתֵּר פָּנִים וּלְבוּשִׁים שָׁוִים, שֶׁהָאוֹר מִסְתַּתֵּר וּמִתְעַלֵּם וּמִתְלַבֵּשׁ בּוֹ. כִּי שְׁנֵיהֶם הֵם מֵהָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה, שֶׁבִּכְלָלוּתוֹ מִסְתַּתֵּר בְּשָׁוֶה הָאוֹר וְהַחִיּוּת שֶׁמֵּרוּחַ פִּיו יִתְבָּרַךְ, בִּבְחִינַת הֶסְתֵּר פָּנִים וִירִידַת הַמַּדְרֵגוֹת בְּהִשְׁתַּלְשְׁלוּת הָעוֹלָמוֹת מִמַּדְרֵגָה לְמַדְרֵגָה בְּצִמְצוּמִים רַבִּים וַעֲצוּמִים, עַד שֶׁנִּתְלַבֵּשׁ בִּקְלִפַּת נֹגַהּ, לְהַחֲיוֹת כְּלָלוּת עוֹלָם הַזֶּה הַחָמְרִי. דְּהַיְנוּ כָּל דְּבָרִים הַמֻּתָּרִים וְהַטְּהוֹרִים שֶׁבָּעוֹלָם הַזֶּה. וּמִמֶּנָּה וְעַל יָדָהּ מֻשְׁפָּעִים דְּבָרִים הַטְּמֵאִים, כִּי הִיא בְּחִינָה מְמֻצַּעַת, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. אַף עַל פִּי כֵּן,
הַהֶאָרָה, שֶׁהִיא הַמְשָׁכַת הַחִיּוּת אֲשֶׁר ה' מֵאִיר וּמְחַיֶּה דֶּרֶךְ לְבוּשׁ זֶה, אֵינָהּ שָׁוָה בְּכֻלָּן בִּבְחִינַת צִמְצוּם וְהִתְפַּשְּׁטוּת.
כִּי בַּגּוּף הַגַּשְׁמִי וְהַדּוֹמֵם מַמָּשׁ, כָּאֲבָנִים וְעָפָר, הַהֶאָרָה הִיא בִּבְחִינַת צִמְצוּם גָּדוֹל אֲשֶׁר אֵין כָּמוֹהוּ, וְהַחִיּוּת שֶׁבּוֹ מֻעֶטֶת כָּל כָּךְ עַד שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ אֲפִלּוּ כֹּחַ הַצּוֹמֵחַ. וּבַצּוֹמֵחַ הַהֶאָרָה אֵינָהּ בְּצִמְצוּם גָּדוֹל כָּל כָּךְ.
וְדֶרֶךְ כְּלָל נֶחְלָקוֹת לְאַרְבַּע מַדְרֵגוֹת: דּוֹמֵם, צוֹמֵחַ, חַי, מְדַבֵּר, כְּנֶגֶד אַרְבַּע אוֹתִיּוֹת שֵׁם הֲוַיָּ"ה בָּרוּךְ הוּא שֶׁמִּמֶּנּוּ מֻשְׁפָּעִים.
Granted, as far as concealment of the Face is concerned, the light in both is identical, and so are the coverings in which it is hidden, veiled and wrapped. Both belong to this world, where the light and vitality issuing from His breath are hidden to the same degree everywhere. This comes about through the hiding of the Face and the step-by-step descent of the worlds, level below level, by way of many intense contractions (tzimtzumim), until the light wraps itself in kelipas nogah in order to sustain this entire physical world, all the permitted and clean things in it. By way of nogah and from it the unclean things too are sustained, since nogah is the intermediate level, as said earlier (chapter 7).
All the same, the radiance, that is, the stream of vitality G‑d sheds through this covering to keep [the creatures] alive, does not reach all of them with the same degree of contraction or expansion.
In the physical body and in the purely lifeless, stones and soil, the radiance is contracted to an extreme beyond compare; the vitality there is so slight that it lacks even the capacity to grow. In vegetation the contraction is much less severe.
Broadly, [everything] falls into four tiers: mineral, vegetable, animal and human (“the speaker”). These match the four letters of G‑d’s Name Havayah, the source of their vitality.
Two scales are at work. One is hiding versus revealing. In this world G‑d’s light passes through kelipas nogah, a veil over everything equally: a stone does not show that G‑d creates it, and neither does the mind of an animal or a person. The other is contraction versus expansion, how much light comes through. Here a stone receives least, then a plant, an animal, a person.
A mashal: hang a thick curtain over a window, and a dim echo of sunlight enters. That is hiding. Board up the window but for one tiny hole, and very little comes in, but it is real sunlight. That is contraction. All creatures stand behind the same curtain; they differ in the size of the hole.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #99 (ch. 38a) — 21:25, 23:25, 29:10, 31:10, 33:30, 34:49, 1:02:47, 1:04:59
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 10:18, 11:22, 12:23
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 1 — 56:31
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 2 — 13:35, 15:05
5.In a mitzvah nothing is hidden
וּכְמוֹ שֶׁאֵין עֵרֶךְ וְדִמְיוֹן הַהֶאָרָה וְהַמְשָׁכַת הַחִיּוּת שֶׁבְּדוֹמֵם וְצוֹמֵחַ לְהַהֶאָרָה וְהַמְשָׁכַת הַחִיּוּת הַמְּלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּחַי וּמְדַבֵּר, אַף שֶׁבְּכֻלָּן אוֹר אֶחָד שָׁוֶה בִּבְחִינַת הֶסְתֵּר פָּנִים, וּמְלֻבָּשׁ בִּלְבוּשׁ אֶחָד בְּכֻלָּן, שֶׁהוּא לְבוּשׁ נֹגַהּ. כָּךְ אֵין עֵרֶךְ וְדִמְיוֹן כְּלָל בֵּין הֶאָרַת וְהַמְשָׁכַת אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא, שֶׁהוּא פְּנִימִיּוּת רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, בְּלִי הֶסְתֵּר פָּנִים וּלְבוּשׁ כְּלָל, הַמְּאִירָה וּמְלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּמִצְווֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת מַמָּשׁ – וְכֵן בַּמִּצְוֹת הַתְּלוּיוֹת בְּדִבּוּר וּבִטּוּי שְׂפָתַיִם בְּלִי כַּוָּנָה, שֶׁהוּא נֶחְשָׁב כְּמַעֲשֶׂה מַמָּשׁ, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל – לְגַבֵּי הַהֶאָרָה וְהַמְשָׁכַת אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא הַמְּאִירָה וּמְלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּכַוָּנַת הַמִּצְוֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת, שֶׁהָאָדָם מִתְכַּוֵּן בַּעֲשִׂיָּתָן כְּדֵי לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ עַל יְדֵי קִיּוּם רְצוֹנוֹ, שֶׁהוּא וּרְצוֹנוֹ אֶחָד.
וְכֵן בְּכַוָּנַת הַתְּפִלָּה וּקְרִיאַת שְׁמַע וּבִרְכוֹתֶיהָ וּשְׁאָר בְּרָכוֹת, שֶׁבְּכַוָּנָתוֹ בָּהֶן מְדַבֵּק מַחֲשַׁבְתּוֹ וְשִׂכְלוֹ בּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ.
Between the radiance and vitality in mineral and plant on one hand, and the radiance and vitality in animal and human on the other, there is no likeness or comparison, though in every one of them, as regards concealment of the Face, the light is the same, wearing the same covering, the covering of nogah. In the very same way there is no likeness or comparison at all between two things. The first is the radiance of the Infinite light, the innermost core of His will, without any hiding of the Face or any covering whatever, which shines into and is invested in the practical mitzvos themselves, and also in mitzvos of speech, words uttered by the lips without kavanah, since that counts as a real deed, as said earlier. The second is the radiance of the Infinite light that shines into and is invested in the kavanah of the practical mitzvos, when a person means, in doing them, to attach himself to G‑d by carrying out His will, since He and His will are one.
The same is true of kavanah in prayer, in the Shema with its blessings and in other blessings: by concentrating on them he binds his thought and mind to G‑d.
Now the comparison turns around. Body and soul in the world are both hidden behind the same curtain. In the deed of a mitzvah and in its kavanah there is no curtain at all. Everything else hides why it exists, but a mitzvah is G‑d’s innermost will with no covering. Why is he fixing a mezuzah to his door? Only because G‑d wants it.
So deed and kavanah differ only in contraction and expansion. The deed alone is the tiny hole: real light, but little of it. Kavanah is the open window. For prayer and the Shema, the Tanya defines kavanah as attending to the words so that one’s thought is joined to G‑d.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #99 (ch. 38a) — 41:28, 43:35, 1:12:06, 1:13:21, 1:14:22
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 14:24, 15:29, 21:32, 22:34, 35:06
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 2 — 06:01, 45:02
6.Not because thought is higher
וְלֹא שֶׁדְּבֵקוּת הַמַּחֲשָׁבָהּ וְשֵׂכֶל הָאָדָם בּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ הִיא מִצַּד עַצְמָהּ לְמַעְלָה מִדְּבֵקוּת קִיּוּם הַמִּצְווֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת בְּפֹעַל מַמָּשׁ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁיִּתְבָּאֵר לְקַמָּן; אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי שֶׁזֶּהוּ גַּם כֵּן רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, לְדָבְקָה בְּשֵׂכֶל וּמַחֲשָׁבָה וְכַוָּנַת הַמִּצְוֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת, וּבְכַוָּנַת קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע וּתְפִלָּה וּשְׁאָר בְּרָכוֹת. וְהֶאָרַת רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן הַזֶּה הַמְּאִירָה וּמְלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְכַוָּנָה זוֹ, הִיא גְּדוֹלָה לְאֵין קֵץ, לְמַעְלָה מַעְלָה מֵהֶאָרַת רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן הַמְּאִירָה וּמְלֻבֶּשֶׁת בְּקִיּוּם הַמִּצְוֹת עַצְמָן, בְּמַעֲשֶׂה וּבְדִבּוּר בְּלִי כַּוָּנָה, כְּגֹדֶל מַעֲלַת אוֹר הַנְּשָׁמָה עַל הַגּוּף, שֶׁהוּא כְּלִי וּמַלְבּוּשׁ הַנְּשָׁמָה, כְּמוֹ גּוּף הַמִּצְוָה עַצְמָהּ, שֶׁהוּא כְּלִי וּמַלְבּוּשׁ לְכַוָּנָתָהּ.
וְאַף שֶׁבִּשְׁתֵּיהֶן, בַּמִּצְוָה וּבְכַוָּנָתָהּ, מְלֻבָּשׁ רָצוֹן אֶחָד פָּשׁוּט בְּתַכְלִית הַפְּשִׁיטוּת, בְּלִי שׁוּם שִׁנּוּי וְרִבּוּי חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, וּמְיֻחָד בְּמַהוּתוֹ וְעַצְמוּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ בְּתַכְלִית הַיִּחוּד – אַף עַל פִּי כֵן, הַהֶאָרָה אֵינָהּ שָׁוָה בִּבְחִינַת צִמְצוּם וְהִתְפַּשְּׁטוּת.
[הגהה: וּכְמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בְּעֵץ חַיִּים, שֶׁכַּוָּנַת הַמִּצְווֹת וְתַלְמוּד תּוֹרָה הִיא בְּמַדְרֵגַת אוֹר, וְגוּף הַמִּצְווֹת הֵן מִדַּרְגַּת וּבְחִינַת כֵּלִים, שֶׁהֵם בְּחִינַת צִמְצוּם, שֶׁעַל יְדֵי צִמְצוּם הָאוֹר נִתְהַוּוּ הַכֵּלִים, כַּיָּדוּעַ לְיוֹדְעֵי חֵ"ן.]
The reason is not that binding one’s thought and mind to G‑d ranks higher in itself than the bond formed by actually doing the practical mitzvos, as later chapters will show. It is that this too is His will: that a person attach himself to Him with his intellect and thought, through kavanah in the practical mitzvos and kavanah in the Shema, prayer and blessings. And the radiance of the Supreme Will that glows within this kavanah is endlessly greater and loftier than the radiance of the Supreme Will that glows within the bare performance of the mitzvos, in deed and in speech, without kavanah. It resembles the advantage of the soul’s light over the body that holds and clothes it: in the same way the mitzvah’s physical performance is the container and covering of its kavanah.
Though in both, the mitzvah and its kavanah, it is a single Will that is invested, utterly simple, free of any change or plurality, Heaven forbid, and wholly one with His essence and being, the radiance still differs in its degree of contraction and expansion,
Note: Etz Chaim likewise explains that the kavanah of the mitzvos and of Torah learning belongs to the order of “light,” while the mitzvos themselves belong to the order of “vessels,” which are light in contracted form. It was by contracting the light that the vessels came to be, a principle familiar to students of Kabbalah.
Is kavanah higher because feelings are worth more than deeds? Between people “it’s the thought that counts”; with G‑d it is not so. The bond made by the deed itself is complete, as later chapters explain. Kavanah matters only because G‑d wants it too; without that, it would be a person experiencing himself.
Nor does G‑d want kavanah “more.” His will has no reason behind it, so it has no more or less. The same will is in both. What differs is how much of it shines into the person: in the deed alone the bond is hardly felt; in kavanah it opens out, and his mind is plainly with G‑d. The note gives the root: the deed is a defined “vessel,” the kavanah the unlimited “light.”
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #99 (ch. 38a) — 44:40, 45:40, 46:40, 47:45
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 24:43, 26:45, 27:47, 30:59, 34:03
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 3 — 01:32, 06:08, 12:10, 16:42, 21:17
7.Four levels, and kavanah born of understanding
וְנֶחֱלֶקֶת גַּם כֵּן לְאַרְבַּע מַדְרֵגוֹת. כִּי גּוּף הַמִּצְווֹת עַצְמָן מַמָּשׁ הֵן שְׁתֵּי מַדְרֵגוֹת, שֶׁהֵן מִצְוֹת מַעֲשִׂיּוֹת מַמָּשׁ, וּמִצְווֹת הַתְּלוּיוֹת בְּדִבּוּר וּמַחֲשָׁבָה, כְּמוֹ תַּלְמוּד תּוֹרָה, וּקְרִיאַת שְׁמַע, וּתְפִלָּה, וּבִרְכַּת הַמָּזוֹן וּשְׁאָר בְּרָכוֹת. וְכַוָּנַת הַמִּצְווֹת לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, שֶׁהִיא כִּנְשָׁמָה לַגּוּף, נֶחֱלֶקֶת גַּם כֵּן לִשְׁתֵּי מַדְרֵגוֹת, כְּמוֹ שְׁתֵּי מַדְרֵגוֹת הַנְּשָׁמָה שֶׁהֵן בַּגּוּף הַחָמְרִי, שֶׁהֵן חַי וּמְדַבֵּר.
כִּי מִי שֶׁדַּעְתּוֹ יָפָה לָדַעַת אֶת ה', וּלְהִתְבּוֹנֵן בִּגְדֻלָּתוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, וּלְהוֹלִיד מִבִּינָתוֹ יִרְאָה עִלָּאָה בְּמֹחוֹ, וְאַהֲבַת ה' בֶּחָלָל הַיְּמָנִי שֶׁבְּלִבּוֹ, לִהְיוֹת נַפְשׁוֹ צְמֵאָה לַה', לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ עַל יְדֵי קִיּוּם הַתּוֹרָה וְהַמִּצְווֹת, שֶׁהֵן הַמְשָׁכַת וְהֶאָרַת אוֹר אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא עַל נַפְשׁוֹ לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ, וּבְכַוָּנָה זוֹ הוּא לוֹמֵד וּמְקַיֵּם הַמִּצְווֹת, וְכֵן בְּכַוָּנָה זוֹ מִתְפַּלֵּל וּמְבָרֵךְ. הֲרֵי כַּוָּנָה זוֹ, עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל, כְּמוֹ נִשְׁמַת הַמְּדַבֵּר, שֶׁהוּא בַּעַל שֵׂכֶל וּבְחִירָה וּבְדַעַת יְדַבֵּר.
and this as well falls into four tiers. The mitzvos’ “body” has two tiers: mitzvos done by actual deed, and mitzvos of speech and thought, such as Torah learning, the Shema, prayer, Grace after Meals and other blessings. The mitzvos’ kavanah, the wish to attach oneself to G‑d, which is to them as a soul is to a body, likewise has two tiers, matching the two kinds of soul found in physical bodies, that of an animal and that of a human being.
Take someone with enough mind to know G‑d and contemplate His greatness, and to draw out of that understanding an exalted awe in his brain and a love for G‑d in the right chamber of his heart, until his soul thirsts for G‑d and longs to attach itself to Him by keeping the Torah and mitzvos, which bring down the Infinite light and let it shine onto his soul so that he can attach himself to Him. If with that kavanah he learns and keeps the mitzvos, and with it he prays and blesses, then his kavanah resembles, as a parable, a human soul, which possesses intellect and free choice and speaks out of understanding.
Mitzvos of action correspond to the inanimate level, and mitzvos of speech and thought to plants: higher, but still “body.” Even praying with understanding is the body of the mitzvah if nothing moves it beyond that. What gives it a soul is the wish to cleave to G‑d, and that can raise any mitzvah to one of the two “soul” levels.
The higher level begins in the mind: he reflects on G‑d’s greatness until it gives birth to awe and love, and these move him to learn, pray and act. That is like a human being, who has intellect and free choice and is not bound by instinct. Love and awe are meant to bring him to the mitzvah; on their own they do not make the bond.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 39:13, 40:15, 42:16, 44:21, 53:40, 54:42
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 3 — 52:56, 54:26
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 4 — 10:00, 13:01, 17:41, 20:42, 24:00
8.Kavanah from the love already there
וּמִי שֶׁדַּעְתּוֹ קְצָרָה לֵידַע וּלְהִתְבּוֹנֵן בִּגְדֻלַּת אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא, לְהוֹלִיד הָאַהֲבָה מִבִּינָתוֹ בְּהִתְגַּלּוּת לִבּוֹ, וְכֵן הַיִּרְאָה בְּמֹחוֹ וּפַחַד ה' בְּלִבּוֹ. רַק שֶׁזּוֹכֵר וּמְעוֹרֵר אֶת הָאַהֲבָה הַטִּבְעִית הַמְּסֻתֶּרֶת בְּלִבּוֹ, וּמוֹצִיאָהּ מֵהַהֶעְלֵם וְהֶסְתֵּר הַלֵּב אֶל הַגִּלּוּי בַּמֹּחַ עַל כָּל פָּנִים, שֶׁיִּהְיֶה רְצוֹנוֹ שֶׁבְּמֹחוֹ וְתַעֲלֻמּוֹת לִבּוֹ מַסְכִּים וּמִתְרַצֶּה בְּרִצּוּי גָּמוּר בֶּאֱמֶת לַאֲמִתּוֹ לִמְסֹר נַפְשׁוֹ בְּפֹעַל מַמָּשׁ עַל יִחוּד ה', כְּדֵי לְדָבְקָה בּוֹ נַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית וּלְבוּשֶׁיהָ, וּלְכָלְלָן בְּיִחוּדוֹ וְאַחְדּוּתוֹ, שֶׁהוּא רָצוֹן הָעֶלְיוֹן הַמְּלֻבָּשׁ בְּתַלְמוּד הַתּוֹרָה וּבְקִיּוּם הַמִּצְווֹת כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל. וְגַם הַיִּרְאָה כְּלוּלָה בָּהּ, לְקַבֵּל מַלְכוּתוֹ, שֶׁלֹּא לִמְרֹד בּוֹ חַס וְשָׁלוֹם. וּבְכַוָּנָה זוֹ הוּא סוּר מֵרָע וְעוֹשֶׂה טוֹב, וְלוֹמֵד וּמִתְפַּלֵּל וּמְבָרֵךְ בְּפֵרוּשׁ הַמִּלּוֹת לְבַדּוֹ, בְּלֹא דְּחִילוּ וּרְחִימוּ בְּהִתְגַּלּוּת לִבּוֹ וּמֹחוֹ. הֲרֵי כַּוָּנָה זוֹ, עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל, כְּמוֹ נִשְׁמַת הַחַי, שֶׁאֵינוֹ בַּעַל שֵׂכֶל וּבְחִירָה. וְכָל מִדּוֹתָיו, שֶׁהֵן יִרְאָתוֹ מִדְּבָרִים הַמַּזִּיקִים אוֹתוֹ, וְאַהֲבָתוֹ לִדְבָרִים הַנֶּאֱהָבִים אֶצְלוֹ, הֵן רַק טִבְעִיִּים אֶצְלוֹ, וְלֹא מִבִּינָתוֹ וְדַעְתּוֹ. וְכָךְ הֵן, עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל, הַיִּרְאָה וְהָאַהֲבָה הַטִּבְעִיּוֹת הַמְּסֻתָּרוֹת בְּלֵב כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל, כִּי הֵן יְרֻשָּׁה לָנוּ מֵאֲבוֹתֵינוּ וּכְמוֹ טֶבַע בְּנַפְשׁוֹתֵינוּ, כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל.
Then there is someone whose grasp is too narrow to know and contemplate the greatness of the Infinite to the point of drawing from his understanding an open love in the heart, with awe in the mind and fear of G‑d in the heart. He can still call to mind and stir up the inborn love concealed in his heart. He brings it out from the heart’s hiding place at least into his conscious mind, so that his mind’s will, and the depths of his heart too, consent and desire, wholeheartedly and in all honesty, actually to surrender his life for G‑d’s Oneness, in order to bind his G‑dly soul and its garments to Him and merge them with His unity, that is, the Supreme Will invested in Torah learning and the mitzvos, as explained above. Within this [love] awe is included too: taking on His sovereignty and never rebelling against Him, Heaven forbid. If with this kavanah he avoids wrongdoing and does what is right, learns, prays and blesses, understanding just the simple sense of the words, with no open awe or love felt in heart or mind, then this kavanah resembles, as a parable, an animal soul. An animal has neither intellect nor free choice; what it feels, its fear of what can hurt it and its liking for what is pleasant, comes from instinct, not from understanding or knowledge. The same holds, by way of illustration, for the inborn love and awe lying hidden in every Jewish heart: we inherited them from our forefathers, and they are a kind of second nature to our souls, as said earlier (chapters 18–19).
What about someone who cannot meditate his way to love and awe? He need not create anything. Every Jew has a hidden love: his soul would give up life rather than be cut off from G‑d. He only has to remember it, and it is enough that his mind is aware of it and agrees. Since the mitzvos unite the soul with G‑d as giving one’s life would, this becomes his reason to keep them. It holds fear too: “Would I break with Him over this?”
So he prays knowing only what the words mean, with no fire in the heart, and it is still real kavanah. It is called “animal” because it is inborn, not because it is lowly: it was planted in us by the Avos. It has less light than the human level, but it is true and always there.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 46:27, 47:30, 48:36, 49:37, 50:37, 1:07:03, 1:08:04, 1:09:04, 1:11:05
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 4 — 27:00, 31:30, 33:01, 36:03, 37:36, 40:37, 42:08, 43:39
The Yesod: The connection is in the deed; the light is in the kavanah
Chapter 38 holds two truths that seem to pull against each other. The halachah says the deed is what counts: words spoken without attention fulfill the mitzvah, and the deepest meditation without words does not. The Sages say that a mitzvah done with no kavanah resembles a body that has no soul. Both are true, and the chapter shows how.
A mitzvah connects a person to G‑d because G‑d asked for it. We cannot reach the Infinite with our own feelings, however lofty. What joins us to Him is doing His will, and His will is wholly in the deed, with nothing hiding it. Someone who shakes a lulav with his mind elsewhere has still held G‑d’s innermost will in his hand. That is why the “body without a soul” is not a corpse: it is a real, living bond, only a dim one.
Kavanah does not create the bond. It lets the bond shine. The same will that is in the deed is in the kavanah, but in the deed alone it comes through a tiny opening, and in kavanah it fills the person. So what is gained is revelation in a person’s own mind and heart, not more of G‑d’s will. And it counts because He wants it: feelings that never reach a mitzvah do not make the bond, and feelings poured into a mitzvah light it up.
This frees a person from two mistakes. One is “I wasn’t inspired, so it didn’t count.” It counted; the deed itself bound you to G‑d. The other is “I did it, so the heart doesn’t matter.” It matters, because G‑d wants the bond to be seen, and to be lived in, not only to exist.
And kavanah is within everyone’s reach. Not everyone can meditate until love and awe burn in the heart. But anyone can stop for a moment and remember what he already is: a soul that would give everything rather than be cut off from G‑d. That memory, held in the mind and agreed to, is already a living soul for the mitzvah.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #99 (ch. 38a) — 13:16, 43:35, 47:45, 49:51
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #100 (ch. 38b) — 28:52, 30:59, 32:00, 1:08:04
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 1 — 28:52, 50:20, 51:52
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 2 — 23:35, 49:36, 51:07
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 3 — 06:08, 22:48
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 38 part 4 — 17:41, 40:37
Points to ponder
- When I do a mitzvah without feeling, do I treat it as worthless, or remember that G‑d’s will is fully in it?
- Where do I count on “it’s the thought that counts” with G‑d, as if good intentions could take the place of the deed?
- Before my next berachah, can I take one moment to know what I am saying and Whom I am saying it to?
- If I cannot feel love and awe today, can I at least remember that my soul would give everything to stay connected to G‑d, and let that be my reason?