פרק ח
Chapter 8: What We Take In: Forbidden Food, Idle Talk and Secular Wisdom
Chapter 7 divided the world into the forbidden and the permitted. Chapter 8 looks at what a person takes into himself, and what it leaves behind: forbidden food that stays “bound” even when eaten innocently, permitted pleasures that leave a trace in the body, and words and ideas that leave a stain on the soul. Each has its own cleansing, and the deepest stain of all is on the mind.
1.Why forbidden food is called “bound”
וְעוֹד זֹאת בְּמַאֲכָלוֹת אֲסוּרוֹת, שֶׁלְּכָךְ נִקְרָאִים בְּשֵׁם אִסּוּר, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאַף מִי שֶׁאָכַל מַאֲכַל אִסּוּר בְּלֹא הוֹדַע לְשֵׁם שָׁמַיִם, לַעֲבֹד ה' בְּכֹחַ אֲכִילָה הַהִיא, וְגַם פָּעַל וְעָשָׂה כֵּן וְקָרָא וְהִתְפַּלֵּל בְּכֹחַ אֲכִילָה הַהִיא, אֵין הַחִיּוּת שֶׁבָּהּ עוֹלָה וּמִתְלַבֶּשֶׁת בְּתֵבוֹת הַתּוֹרָה וְהַתְּפִלָּה כְּמוֹ הַהֶתֵּר, מִפְּנֵי אִסּוּרָהּ בִּידֵי הַסִּטְרָא אַחֲרָא מִשָּׁלֹשׁ קְלִפּוֹת הַטְּמֵאוֹת. וַאֲפִלּוּ הוּא אִסּוּר דְּרַבָּנָן, שֶׁחֲמוּרִים דִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים יוֹתֵר מִדִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה כו'.
There is something more about forbidden foods, which is why they are called issur [“bound”]. Even someone who ate forbidden food without knowing it, for the sake of Heaven, to serve G‑d with the strength of that food, and who actually did so, learning and praying with that strength, the life in the food does not rise and clothe itself in the words of Torah and prayer, as happens with permitted food. This is because it is held “bound” in the hands of the sitra achra of the three impure kelipos. And it holds even where the ban is only rabbinic, since “the rulings of the Scribes weigh more heavily than the rulings of the Torah,” and so forth.
In chapter 7 we learned that permitted food eaten for the sake of Heaven is raised up: its life rises and clothes itself in the Torah study and prayer that its energy fuelled. Now the Alter Rebbe adds that forbidden food cannot be raised at all. That is the meaning of its name. Issur means “bound”: its life is held captive by the three impure kelipos and cannot be released.
Look at the case he chooses. The person did not know. His intention was for the sake of Heaven, and he really did learn and pray with that strength. Even so, the food stays what it is. Most sins are something a person does. Forbidden food is something he takes in, and it becomes part of him. That is why even an innocent mistake does not free it.
The rule holds even when the prohibition is only rabbinic, because, in the Mishnah’s words, the Sages’ enactments are treated with even greater severity than Torah law itself.
Sources
2.Two kinds of desire: “non-Jewish” and “Jewish” demons
וְלָכֵן גַּם הַיֵּצֶר הָרַע וְכֹחַ הַמִּתְאַוֶּה לִדְבָרִים הָאֲסוּרִים הוּא שֵׁד מִשֵּׁדִין נֻכְרָאִין, שֶׁהוּא יֵצֶר הָרַע שֶׁל אֻמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם, שֶׁנַּפְשׁוֹתֵיהֶם מִשָּׁלֹשׁ קְלִפּוֹת הַטְּמֵאוֹת.
מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן הַיֵּצֶר הָרַע וְכֹחַ הַמִּתְאַוֶּה לִדְבָרִים הַמֻּתָּרִים לְמַלֹּאת תַּאֲוָתוֹ הוּא שֵׁד מִשֵּׁדִין יְהוּדָאִין, לְפִי שֶׁיָּכוֹל לַחֲזֹר לִקְדֻשָּׁה כְּדִלְעֵיל. אַךְ מִכָּל מָקוֹם קֹדֶם שֶׁחָזַר לִקְדֻשָּׁה הוּא סִטְרָא אַחֲרָא וּקְלִפָּה. וְגַם אַחַר כָּךְ הָרְשִׁימוּ מִמֶּנּוּ נִשְׁאָר דָּבוּק בַּגּוּף, לִהְיוֹת כִּי מִכָּל מַאֲכָל וּמַשְׁקֶה נַעֲשֶׂה תֵּכֶף דָּם וּבָשָׂר מִבְּשָׂרוֹ.
So, too, the evil inclination and the power that desires forbidden things is “one of the non-Jewish demons.” It is the evil inclination of the nations, whose souls come from the three impure kelipos.
This is not so with the evil inclination and the power that desires permitted things to satisfy one’s appetite. It is “one of the Jewish demons,” because it can return to holiness, as explained above [chapter 7]. Still, before it has returned to holiness, it is sitra achra and kelipah. And even afterwards, a trace (reshimu) of it remains attached to the body, because every food and drink at once becomes blood and flesh of a person’s flesh.
Since the two kinds of food come from two sources, so do the two kinds of desire. The craving for what is forbidden comes from the same place as the forbidden things themselves, the three impure kelipos. It is called a “non-Jewish demon” because it is foreign to a Jew’s nature. A Jew’s animal soul comes from kelipas nogah, so its natural pull is toward the permitted. The foreign craving is acquired: a person who sinks himself in permitted pleasures can become so coarse that he begins to want the forbidden too.
The pull toward the permitted is called a “Jewish demon.” It is still a demon: until the person turns what he ate to holiness, it is sitra achra. But it can be redeemed. When he returns to learning and serving G‑d, the energy of that food rises.
Then comes a sobering point. Even after it has been raised, something stays behind. What was eaten purely for pleasure was on the wrong side when it was eaten, and in that moment it already became his flesh and blood. Teshuvah raises the energy to holiness, but a physical trace remains in the body itself.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #27 (ch. 8a) — 20:53, 21:31, 21:48, 22:20, 22:44, 23:15, 29:55, 30:45, 30:55, 31:35, 31:41
3.Cleansing the body
וְלָכֵן צָרִיךְ הַגּוּף לְחִבּוּט הַקֶּבֶר, לְנַקּוֹתוֹ וּלְטַהֲרוֹ מִטֻּמְאָתוֹ שֶׁקִּבֵּל בַּהֲנָאַת עוֹלָם הַזֶּה וְתַעֲנוּגָיו מִטֻּמְאַת קְלִפַּת נֹגַהּ וְשֵׁדִין יְהוּדָאִין, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן מִי שֶׁלֹּא נֶהֱנֶה מֵעוֹלָם הַזֶּה כָּל יָמָיו, כְּרַבֵּנוּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ.
That is why the body needs chibut hakever [the “beating of the grave”], to scour it clean of the defilement it took on through enjoying this world and its pleasures, from the impurity of kelipas nogah and the “Jewish demons.” The exception is someone who never enjoyed this world all his life, like Rabbeinu HaKadosh [Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi].
That trace in the body has to be cleansed, and the body itself is cleansed after the soul has left it. That is chibut hakever. It is not that the body is bad. Its purpose is to reflect G‑d’s goodness, and it becomes impure only through what it was used for.
The exception is Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi, who at his passing said that he had not enjoyed this world even with his little finger. The phrase can be read two ways. Either he truly took no pleasure, or his pleasure was “not of this world,” because everything he did was for the sake of Heaven.
The second reading matters. Not enjoying this world does not have to mean refusing every pleasure. It can mean that the pleasure itself belongs to serving G‑d.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #27 (ch. 8a) — 32:50, 33:24, 33:30, 34:26, 34:37, 34:46, 35:30, 35:43, 35:52, 35:59, 39:34, 39:41, 39:48
4.Permitted idle talk and the “hollow of a sling”
וְעַל דְּבָרִים בְּטֵלִים בְּהֶתֵּר, כְּגוֹן עַם הָאָרֶץ שֶׁאֵינוֹ יָכוֹל לִלְמֹד, צָרִיךְ לְטַהֵר נַפְשׁוֹ מִטֻּמְאָה זוֹ דִּקְלִפָּה זוֹ עַל יְדֵי גִּלְגּוּלָהּ בְּכַף הַקֶּלַע, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתוּב בַּזֹּהַר פָּרָשַׁת בְּשַׁלַּח דַּף נ"ט.
As for idle talk that is permitted, such as that of an unlearned person who is not able to study, he must cleanse his soul of the impurity of this kelipah by its being whirled in kaf hakela [the “hollow of a sling”], as the Zohar says (Parshas Beshalach, page 59).
What eating does to the body, speech does to the soul. Why does the Alter Rebbe take the case of someone who cannot study? Because for anyone who can, the duty to learn never stops, so idle talk is not permitted for him. For one who cannot, empty talk with nothing forbidden in it is permitted. It belongs to kelipas nogah.
Even so, it leaves its mark, and the soul must be cleansed by kaf hakela. The image comes from the verse “the souls of your enemies He shall sling out, as from the hollow of a sling” (I Shmuel 25:29), which the Talmud describes as souls hurled across the world from end to end. What that means: the soul is tossed between two poles. At first it is made to see how true and how dear holiness is. Then it is thrown back into the empty thoughts and words it filled itself with in this world. That contrast is painful.
Eating is bodily, so the body is cleansed. Speech is finer, so the soul is. And there is a simple remedy. The Previous Rebbe taught (Hayom Yom, 7 Teves) that reciting words of Torah by heart while going about one’s day, such as Chumash, Mishnah, Tehillim or Tanya, protects from this, besides its own worth as Torah study.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #28 (ch. 8b) — 14:02, 14:42, 14:59, 15:40, 16:51, 17:43, 28:09, 28:16, 28:29
5.Forbidden speech, and time taken from Torah
אֲבָל לְדִבּוּרִים אֲסוּרִים, כְּמוֹ לֵצָנוּת וְלָשׁוֹן הָרַע וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָּהֶם, שֶׁהֵן מִשָּׁלֹשׁ קְלִפּוֹת הַטְּמֵאוֹת לְגַמְרֵי, אֵין כַּף הַקֶּלַע [לְבַדּוֹ] מוֹעִיל לְטַהֵר וּלְהַעֲבִיר טֻמְאָתוֹ מֵהַנֶּפֶשׁ, רַק צְרִיכָה לֵירֵד לְגֵיהִנֹּם.
וְכֵן מִי שֶׁאֶפְשָׁר לוֹ לַעֲסֹק בַּתּוֹרָה וְעוֹסֵק בִּדְבָרִים בְּטֵלִים, אֵין כַּף הַקֶּלַע לְבַדּוֹ מוֹעִיל לְנַפְשׁוֹ לְמָרְקָהּ וּלְזַכְּכָהּ, רַק עֳנָשִׁים חֲמוּרִים שֶׁמַּעֲנִישִׁים עַל בִּטּוּל תּוֹרָה בִּפְרָטוּת, מִלְּבַד עֹנֶשׁ הַכְּלָלִי לְכָל בִּטּוּל מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה מֵחֲמַת עַצְלוּת בְּגֵיהִנֹּם שֶׁל שֶׁלֶג, כַּמְבֹאָר בְּמָקוֹם אַחֵר.
But for forbidden speech, such as mockery, slander and the like, which come from the three wholly impure kelipos, the hollow of a sling [alone] is not enough to cleanse the soul and remove its impurity. It must go down to Gehinom.
So too, one who is able to learn Torah but spends his time on idle talk: the hollow of a sling alone cannot scour and refine his soul. He needs the severe punishments given for neglecting Torah in particular, besides the general punishment for neglecting any positive mitzvah out of laziness, in the Gehinom of snow, as explained elsewhere.
Permitted idle talk is like dust on a garment. Shake it hard enough and it comes out. Forbidden speech is like a stain: no amount of shaking will remove it. It needs washing. That is Gehinom, a deeper cleansing for a deeper stain.
The second case is striking. The words themselves are not forbidden. But for someone who could have been learning, they took the place of Torah. For him they are not innocent chatter but bittul Torah, neglect of Torah study, so the hollow of a sling alone cannot cleanse them. One way to see why the punishment is so severe: Torah study is equal to all the other mitzvos together, and this time was taken from it.
On top of that comes the general punishment for any positive mitzvah left undone through laziness. Gehinom works measure for measure. Sins done in the heat of desire are cleansed with fire. Sins of omission, which come from coldness and lack of feeling, are cleansed with snow.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #28 (ch. 8b) — 46:24, 47:38, 48:07, 48:31, 48:34, 48:45, 49:01, 49:27, 50:04, 50:17, 51:19, 51:30, 53:00, 53:06
6.Secular wisdom: a stain on the mind
וְכֵן הָעוֹסֵק בְּחָכְמוֹת אֻמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם, בִּכְלַל דְּבָרִים בְּטֵלִים יֵחָשֵׁב לְעִנְיַן עֲוֹן בִּטּוּל תּוֹרָה, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַבְתִּי בְּהִלְכוֹת תַּלְמוּד תּוֹרָה.
וְעוֹד זֹאת יְתֵרָה טֻמְאָתָהּ שֶׁל חָכְמַת הָאֻמּוֹת עַל טֻמְאַת דְּבָרִים בְּטֵלִים, שֶׁאֵינוֹ מַלְבִּישׁ וּמְטַמֵּא רַק הַמִּדּוֹת מִיסוֹד הָרוּחַ הַקָּדוֹשׁ שֶׁבְּנַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית בְּטֻמְאַת קְלִפַּת נֹגַהּ שֶׁבִּדְבָרִים בְּטֵלִים, הַבָּאִים מִיסוֹד הָרוּחַ הָרַע שֶׁבִּקְלִפָּה זוֹ בְּנַפְשׁוֹ הַבַּהֲמִית כְּדִלְעֵיל, וְלֹא בְּחִינַת חָכְמָה בִּינָה וָדַעַת שֶׁבְּנַפְשׁוֹ, מֵאַחַר שֶׁהֵם דִּבְרֵי שְׁטוּת וּבוּרוּת שֶׁגַּם הַשּׁוֹטִים וְעַמֵּי הָאָרֶץ יְכוֹלִים לְדַבֵּר כֵּן.
מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן בְּחָכְמַת הָאֻמּוֹת, הוּא מַלְבִּישׁ וּמְטַמֵּא בְּחִינַת חָכְמָה בִּינָה וָדַעַת שֶׁבְּנַפְשׁוֹ הָאֱלֹהִית בְּטֻמְאַת קְלִפַּת נֹגַהּ שֶׁבְּחָכְמוֹת אֵלּוּ, שֶׁנָּפְלוּ שָׁמָּה בִּשְׁבִירַת הַכֵּלִים מִבְּחִינַת אֲחוֹרַיִם שֶׁל חָכְמָה דִּקְדֻשָּׁה, כַּיָּדוּעַ לְיוֹדְעֵי חֵ"ן.
Likewise, one who occupies himself with the wisdom of the nations is counted with those who engage in idle talk, as far as the sin of neglecting Torah is concerned, as written in Hilchos Talmud Torah.
Moreover, the impurity of the nations’ wisdom exceeds that of idle talk. Idle talk clothes and defiles only the middos [emotions], which come from the element of holy ruach [air] in his G‑dly soul, with the impurity of kelipas nogah in idle talk, which comes from the element of evil ruach [air] belonging to this kelipah within his animal soul, as explained above [chapter 1]. It does not defile the chochmah, binah and da’as [intellect] of his soul, because such talk is foolishness and ignorance, which even fools and unlearned people can speak.
This is not so with the wisdom of the nations. Through it he clothes and defiles the chochmah, binah and da’as of his G‑dly soul with the impurity of kelipas nogah in these sciences. They fell there in the “breaking of the vessels,” from the “back side” (achorayim) of holy wisdom, as is known to those who know the hidden wisdom.
By the wisdom of the nations the Alter Rebbe means the secular sciences. First, a plain point of law: time spent on them instead of Torah counts as idle talk.
Then a deeper point. The soul’s powers follow the four elements, as chapter 1 explained, and the emotions come from its element of air. Empty chatter engages the emotions and drags them into the animal soul’s own “air.” It never reaches the intellect, because nonsense needs no intellect. Anyone can talk that way.
Secular wisdom does reach the intellect. Unlike idle chatter, it engages chochmah, binah and da’as. But its source is only the “back side” of holy wisdom, which fell in the breaking of the vessels, and it carries the impurity of kelipas nogah into the mind. That is the text’s reason. One way to put it in everyday terms: these sciences describe what things are and how they work, but leave out why, and the Creator behind them. Taken in for their own sake, they shape the mind itself.
So idle talk stains the heart, but secular study can stain the mind. And since the mind is meant to rule the heart, that is the deeper stain.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #28 (ch. 8b) — 54:17, 55:50, 1:02:42, 1:04:32, 1:07:39, 1:08:00, 1:08:58, 1:09:35, 1:09:43, 1:11:22, 1:12:17
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 8 part 2, chapter 9 part 1 — 10:28, 11:49, 13:40
7.When wisdom becomes a tool
אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן עוֹשֶׂה אוֹתָן קַרְדֹּם לַחְתֹּךְ בָּהֶן, דְּהַיְנוּ כְּדֵי לְהִתְפַּרְנֵס מֵהֶן בְּרֶוַח לַעֲבֹד ה', אוֹ שֶׁיּוֹדֵעַ לְהִשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בָּהֶן לַעֲבוֹדַת ה' אוֹ לְתוֹרָתוֹ, וְזֶהוּ טַעֲמוֹ שֶׁל הָרַמְבַּ"ם וְרַמְבַּ"ן זַ"ל וְסִיעָתָן שֶׁעָסְקוּ בָּהֶן.
This is unless he makes them “an axe to cut with”: that is, to earn a comfortable living from them so as to serve G‑d, or he knows how to use them in the service of G‑d or for His Torah. This is the reason why the Rambam and the Ramban, of blessed memory, and those like them, engaged in them.
There are two ways to turn secular wisdom into a tool. The first is a living: a person learns a skill to support himself comfortably so that he can serve G‑d. The second is to use the knowledge itself for Torah, such as using mathematics to understand the laws of sanctifying the new moon.
One way to see the two ways: they match the two ways of eating in chapter 7. A living from a skill is like food that gives strength for a mitzvah. Using the knowledge for Torah is like the food of Shabbos, where the eating is itself part of the mitzvah.
That is why the Rambam and the Ramban engaged in these studies. They knew how to use them for the service of G‑d and Torah. What decides is not the subject but what it is for.
Sources
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #28 (ch. 8b) — 1:14:59, 1:15:50
The Yesod: What you take in becomes you
Chapter 8 can look like a list of punishments. Underneath it is one simple idea: what a person takes in becomes part of him. Food becomes flesh and blood. Words shape the heart. Ideas shape the mind. The Alter Rebbe is not only telling us what is allowed. He is showing us what we are made of.
In a way this is the mirror image of chapter 5. There we learned that Torah is unlike every other mitzvah, because a person takes it into his mind and it becomes one with him. Here the same law works the other way. Most sins are something a person does and then leaves behind. What he takes in stays with him. That is why forbidden food remains “bound” even when eaten unknowingly, and why even permitted food, eaten only for pleasure, leaves a trace in the body after teshuvah has raised its energy.
The chapter also sets out a ladder. Food reaches the body. Idle talk reaches the emotions. Secular wisdom reaches the intellect, the very top of the soul. The finer the thing taken in, the deeper it goes, and the deeper the cleansing it needs: the body in the grave, the soul in the hollow of a sling, a stain that needs Gehinom. And for one who could have learned, the question is not only what he filled his time with, but what it pushed out.
This changes how a person sees his day. The line is not only between forbidden and permitted. Within the permitted, the question is what it is for. Permitted food eaten for the sake of Heaven becomes holiness. Permitted talk with no purpose leaves a mark. Even real wisdom can stain the mind, or become “an axe to cut with” in the hands of someone who knows what it is for.
It also takes away a false picture of holiness. Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi could say he had not enjoyed this world even with his little finger, and one reading is that his pleasure was “not of this world,” because all of it was for Heaven. The goal is not only to take in less of the world. It is to take it in for the right reason, so that what becomes part of me is something I would want to become.
And the remedy is close at hand. The Previous Rebbe’s advice to say words of Torah by heart while going about the day fills the empty moments, so that what a person takes in all day long is holiness.
Sources
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Let’s Talk Tanya (7 Teves) — 00:44, 01:11, 01:52, 02:07
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #27 (ch. 8a) — 29:55, 30:45, 39:34, 39:48
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, A Tale of Two Souls #28 (ch. 8b) — 28:09, 28:29, 1:14:59
- Rabbi Naftali Silberberg, Tanya ch. 8 part 2, chapter 9 part 1 — 10:28, 11:49, 13:40
Points to ponder
- What did I take in today, through my mouth, my ears and my eyes, and what is it becoming in me?
- Which of my permitted pleasures do I enjoy “for the sake of Heaven”, and which just for myself? What would change if I asked before, not after?
- Where do empty words fill my day? Which moment tomorrow could I fill with a few words of Torah by heart instead?
- What I study and read shapes my mind. Is there something I take in that leaves G‑d out of the picture, and how could I make it “an axe to cut with”?