תניאTanya Explained

פרק יג

Chapter 13: Like a Rasha: The Beinoni and the Oath Explained

In short

Chapter 13 answers the question the Tanya opened with: how can a soul be sworn to see itself “like a rasha” and still serve G‑d with joy? The beinoni acts like a tzaddik, but his heart is like a rasha’s; the evil is held back, and in prayer only asleep. Even so, his love of G‑d in prayer, though it fades, is true on his own level.

1.Judged by both, ruled by neither

וּבָזֶה יוּבַן לְשׁוֹן מַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: בֵּינוֹנִים זֶה וָזֶה שׁוֹפְטָן [פֵּרוּשׁ, יֵצֶר טוֹב וְיֵצֶר הָרַע], דִּכְתִיב: "כִּי יַעֲמֹד לִימִין אֶבְיוֹן לְהוֹשִׁיעַ מִשֹּׁפְטֵי נַפְשׁוֹ". וְלֹא אָמְרוּ זֶה וָזֶה מוֹשְׁלִים חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, כִּי כְּשֶׁיֵּשׁ אֵיזוֹ שְׁלִיטָה וּמֶמְשָׁלָה לַיֵּצֶר הָרַע בָּעִיר קְטַנָּה אֲפִלּוּ לְפִי שָׁעָה קַלָּה, נִקְרָא רָשָׁע בְּאוֹתָהּ שָׁעָה.

Translation

This clarifies how our Sages phrased it: “Beinonim are judged by the one and by the other” (namely the good and the evil inclination), on the basis of the verse: “For He takes His place at the right side of the needy, to rescue him from those who pass judgment on his soul.” They deliberately avoided saying “governed by the one and by the other”, G‑d forbid. For whenever the evil inclination holds any sway or control over the “small city” [the body], even for an instant, the person carries the name rasha for that time.

Explanation

Chapter 12 described the beinoni, who feels the animal soul’s pull yet never sins. Now the Alter Rebbe shows this is what the Sages meant. The verse speaks of “those who judge his soul”, in the plural: two judges in one person, the good inclination and the evil.

And they said “judged”, not “ruled”. If the evil inclination ruled him even for a moment, he would be a rasha at that moment. In the beinoni it has a voice, never the final say.

Sources

2.Two judges and the One who decides

אֶלָּא הַיֵּצֶר הָרַע אֵינוֹ רַק עַל דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל כְּמוֹ שׁוֹפֵט וְדַיָּן הָאוֹמֵר דַּעְתּוֹ בַּמִּשְׁפָּט, וְאַף עַל פִּי כֵן יָכוֹל לִהְיוֹת שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיֶה פְּסַק הֲלָכָה כָּךְ לְמַעֲשֶׂה, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁיֵּשׁ עוֹד שׁוֹפֵט וְדַיָּן הַחוֹלֵק עָלָיו וְצָרִיךְ לְהַכְרִיעַ בֵּינֵיהֶם וַהֲלָכָה כְּדִבְרֵי הַמַּכְרִיעַ.

כָּךְ הַיֵּצֶר הָרַע אוֹמֵר דַּעְתּוֹ בֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי שֶׁבַּלֵּב, וּמֵהַלֵּב עוֹלֶה לַמֹּחַ לְהַרְהֵר בּוֹ, וּמִיָּד חוֹלֵק עָלָיו הַשּׁוֹפֵט הַשֵּׁנִי, שֶׁהוּא הַנֶּפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית שֶׁבַּמֹּחַ הַמִּתְפַּשֵּׁט בֶּחָלָל הַיְּמָנִי שֶׁבַּלֵּב, מְקוֹם מִשְׁכַּן הַיֵּצֶר טוֹב. וַהֲלָכָה כְּדִבְרֵי הַמַּכְרִיעַ, הוּא הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא הָעוֹזְרוֹ לְהַיֵּצֶר טוֹב, כְּמַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: "אִלְמָלֵא הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא עוֹזְרוֹ אֵין יָכוֹל לוֹ".

וְהָעֵזֶר הִיא הַהֶאָרָה שֶׁמֵּאִיר אוֹר ה' עַל נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית לִהְיוֹת לָהּ יִתְרוֹן וּשְׁלִיטָה עַל סִכְלוּת הַכְּסִיל וְיֵצֶר הָרַע, כִּיתְרוֹן הָאוֹר מִן הַחֹשֶׁךְ כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל.

Translation

Rather, the evil inclination is only, by way of comparison, like a judge or magistrate who states his opinion on a case. Even so, the ruling may not be decided that way in practice, because there is another judge or magistrate who disagrees with him. The two must then be arbitrated, and the ruling follows the arbitrator.

In the same way, the evil inclination voices its view in the heart’s left side, and that view climbs from the heart up into the brain to be considered. Immediately the second judge contests it: the G‑dly soul seated in the brain, which extends into the heart’s right side, home of the good inclination. And the decision goes with the one who settles the dispute, the Holy One, blessed be He, who sides with the good inclination and supports it, as our Sages taught: “Without the help of the Holy One, blessed be He, a person would be unable to prevail over it.”

That aid is the illumination G‑d’s light casts upon the G‑dly soul, giving it superiority and mastery over the foolishness of the fool, meaning the evil inclination, just as light is superior to darkness, as explained earlier.

Explanation

The Alter Rebbe compares this to a court: one judge gives his opinion, a second disagrees, and an arbitrator decides the ruling.

In the beinoni, a desire starts in the left side of the heart and rises to the mind on its own. At once, not an hour later, the second judge objects: the G‑dly soul in the mind, which extends into the right side of the heart, where the good inclination dwells. Then G‑d, the arbitrator, decides for the good inclination.

His help is a ray of G‑d’s light shining on the G‑dly soul, giving it the edge light has over darkness: a little light pushes away much darkness.

Sources

3.“Like a rasha”: the oath explained

אַךְ מֵאַחַר שֶׁהָרַע שֶׁבֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי בַּבֵּינוֹנִי הוּא בְּתָקְפּוֹ כְּתוֹלַדְתּוֹ לְהִתְאַוּוֹת תַּאֲוָה לְכָל תַּעֲנוּגֵי עוֹלָם הַזֶּה, וְלֹא נִתְבַּטֵּל בְּמִעוּט לְגַבֵּי הַטּוֹב וְלֹא נִדְחָה מִמְּקוֹמוֹ כְּלָל, רַק שֶׁאֵין לוֹ שְׁלִיטָה וּמֶמְשָׁלָה לְהִתְפַּשֵּׁט בְּאֵבָרֵי הַגּוּף, מִפְּנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא הָעוֹמֵד לִימִין אֶבְיוֹן וְעוֹזֵר וּמֵאִיר לַנֶּפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית, לָכֵן נִקְרָא כְּרָשָׁע, כְּמַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: "אֲפִלּוּ כָּל הָעוֹלָם כֻּלּוֹ אוֹמְרִים לְךָ צַדִּיק אַתָּה הֱיֵה בְּעֵינֶיךָ כְּרָשָׁע". וְלֹא רָשָׁע מַמָּשׁ, אֶלָּא שֶׁיַּחֲזִיק עַצְמוֹ לְבֵינוֹנִי, וְלֹא לְהַאֲמִין לְהָעוֹלָם שֶׁאוֹמְרִים שֶׁהָרַע שֶׁבּוֹ נִתְבַּטֵּל לְגַבֵּי הַטּוֹב, שֶׁזּוֹ מַדְרֵגַת צַדִּיק, אֶלָּא יִהְיֶה בְּעֵינָיו כְּאִלּוּ מַהוּתוֹ וְעַצְמוּתוֹ שֶׁל הָרַע הוּא בְּתָקְפּוֹ וּבִגְבוּרָתוֹ בֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי כְּתוֹלַדְתּוֹ, וְלֹא חָלַף וְהָלַךְ מִמֶּנּוּ מְאוּמָה, וְאַדְּרַבָּה נִתְחַזֵּק יוֹתֵר בְּהֶמְשֵׁךְ הַזְּמַן שֶׁנִּשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בּוֹ הַרְבֵּה בַּאֲכִילָה וּשְׁתִיָּה וּשְׁאָר עִנְיְנֵי עוֹלָם הַזֶּה.

Translation

In the beinoni, however, the evil on the heart’s left side keeps all the force it had from the day he was born, longing for every worldly pleasure. It has not been dissolved into insignificance beside the good, nor dislodged from where it sits in the least. What it lacks is only the authority to extend itself into the body’s limbs, thanks to the Holy One, blessed be He, who “takes His place at the right side of the needy”, coming to the G‑dly soul’s aid and lighting its way. For this reason the beinoni is termed “like a rasha”, as our Sages put it: “Though everyone in the world assures you that you are a tzaddik, regard yourself as though you were a rasha.” Not truly a rasha. The point is that he should count himself a beinoni and refuse to accept the world’s verdict that his evil has dissolved before the good, since that would be the rank of a tzaddik. He should instead regard the evil, in its very essence, as retaining its full force and vigor in the heart’s left side, just as at birth, with nothing of it having faded or disappeared. If anything, time has made it stronger, because he has given it so much use in food, drink and other worldly affairs.

Explanation

Here, at last, is the answer to the question that opened the book. How can the soul be sworn to see itself as a rasha, when the Mishnah says “Do not be a rasha in your own eyes”, and such a thought brings sadness?

The key is one letter: kerasha, “like” a rasha. The beinoni’s deeds are as clean as a tzaddik’s, but the evil in his heart is the rasha’s evil, at full strength, and if anything stronger after years of eating, drinking and ordinary living. What holds it back is G‑d’s help, not a change in the evil. In what he does he resembles the tzaddik; in what he is, the rasha.

So the oath asks him to see himself as a beinoni and not believe the world, which sees only behavior. Believing it, he would stop fighting, and could fall far below a beinoni.

Think of a heart patient whose condition is under control. If he decides he is completely healthy, he drops his guard and falls ill again. And because he knows his condition, a sudden symptom after a good stretch does not make him despair; it is what he was told to expect.

Sources

4.Even one who learns all day

וְאַף מִי שֶׁבְּתוֹרַת ה' חֶפְצוֹ וְיֶהְגֶּה בָּהּ יוֹמָם וָלַיְלָה לִשְׁמָהּ, אֵין זוֹ הוֹכָחָה כְּלָל שֶׁנִּדְחָה הָרַע מִמְּקוֹמוֹ, אֶלָּא יָכוֹל לִהְיוֹת שֶׁמַּהוּתוֹ וְעַצְמוּתוֹ הוּא בְּתָקְפּוֹ וּבִגְבוּרָתוֹ בִּמְקוֹמוֹ בֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי, רַק שֶׁלְּבוּשָׁיו שֶׁהֵם מַחֲשָׁבָה דִּבּוּר וּמַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁל נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית אֵינָן מִתְלַבְּשִׁים בַּמֹּחַ וְהַפֶּה וְהַיָּדַיִם וּשְׁאָר אֵבָרֵי הַגּוּף, מִפְּנֵי ה' שֶׁנָּתַן שְׁלִיטָה וּמֶמְשָׁלָה לַמֹּחַ עַל הַלֵּב. וְלָכֵן נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית שֶׁבַּמֹּחַ מוֹשֶׁלֶת בְּעִיר קְטַנָּה, אֵבָרֵי הַגּוּף כֻּלָּם, שֶׁיִּהְיוּ לְבוּשׁ וּמֶרְכָּבָה לִשְׁלֹשֶׁת לְבוּשֶׁיהָ שֶׁיִּתְלַבְּשׁוּ בָּהֶם, שֶׁהֵם מַחֲשָׁבָה דִּבּוּר וּמַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁל תַּרְיָ"ג מִצְוֹת הַתּוֹרָה.

Translation

Even a person whose every longing is for G‑d’s Torah, who toils in it day and night with pure motives, cannot take this as any evidence that the evil has been dislodged. Its very essence and substance may remain at full force and vigor where it always was, on the heart’s left side. It is only its garments, the animal soul’s thought, speech and deed, that fail to take hold of the brain, the mouth, the hands and the body’s other limbs, since G‑d granted the brain authority and control over the heart. That is how the G‑dly soul in the brain governs the “small city”, all the body’s limbs, which become a robe and a vehicle into which its own three garments enter: thinking, speaking and doing the 613 commandments of the Torah.

Explanation

So far the beinoni has been a working man, busy with the world most of the day. Even one who learns Torah day and night, for its own sake, proves nothing by it about his heart. The evil may still sit in its place at full strength.

Only its garments, its thought, speech and action, are kept out of his mind, mouth and hands. Because G‑d gave the mind rule over the heart, and he uses that power all day, his G‑dly soul rules the whole body for the mitzvos. That is rule over the body, not a change in the heart.

Sources

5.Only in prayer, and only the upper hand

אֲבָל מַהוּתָהּ וְעַצְמוּתָהּ שֶׁל נֶפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית אֵין לָהּ שְׁלִיטָה וּמֶמְשָׁלָה עַל מַהוּתָהּ וְעַצְמוּתָהּ שֶׁל נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית בַּבֵּינוֹנִי, כִּי אִם בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁאַהֲבַת ה' הִיא בְּהִתְגַּלּוּת לִבּוֹ בְּעִתִּים מְזֻמָּנִים, כְּמוֹ בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּפִלָּה וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָּהּ. וְאַף גַּם זֹאת הַפַּעַם אֵינָהּ רַק שְׁלִיטָה וּמֶמְשָׁלָה לְבַד, כְּדִכְתִיב: "וּלְאֹם מִלְאֹם יֶאֱמָץ", כְּשֶׁזֶּה קָם זֶה נוֹפֵל וּכְשֶׁזֶּה קָם וכו'. שֶׁנֶּפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית מִתְאַמֶּצֶת וּמִתְגַּבֶּרֶת עַל נֶפֶשׁ הַבַּהֲמִית בִּמְקוֹר הַגְּבוּרוֹת, שֶׁהִיא בִּינָה, לְהִתְבּוֹנֵן בִּגְדֻלַּת ה' אֵין סוֹף בָּרוּךְ הוּא וּלְהוֹלִיד אַהֲבָה עַזָּה לַה' כְּרִשְׁפֵּי אֵשׁ בֶּחָלָל הַיְמָנִי שֶׁבְּלִבּוֹ, וְאָז אִתְכַּפְיָא סִטְרָא אַחֲרָא שֶׁבֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי.

Translation

The G‑dly soul’s essence, however, holds no sway over the animal soul’s essence in the beinoni, except for the moments when his love for G‑d stands revealed in his heart, at particular times such as prayer and similar occasions. And at those moments too it is merely a matter of having the upper hand, as Scripture says: “And one people shall be stronger than the other people”, [which the Sages explained:] “As the one ascends, the other descends, and as the other ascends…” The G‑dly soul gathers strength and gets the better of the animal soul by drawing on the wellspring of might (gevuros), that is, understanding (binah): it reflects on how great G‑d, the blessed Ein Sof, is, and thereby brings forth an intense love for G‑d, like bursts of flame, on the heart’s right side. At that point the sitra achra on the left side is held down.

Explanation

The G‑dly soul rules the beinoni’s actions, not the animal soul itself, except at set times such as prayer, when his love of G‑d is open and felt in the heart.

Even then it only has the upper hand, like Yaakov over Esav: when this one rises, that one falls. The saying is left unfinished, because the point is that the fallen one can rise again.

The strength comes from binah, understanding, the source of gevurah, strength. He contemplates G‑d’s greatness until it gives birth to a fiery love, and the sitra achra (the “other side”, the evil) is subdued. Prayer is not only saying words; it is thinking deeply enough for the heart to catch fire.

Sources

6.Asleep, not gone

אֲבָל לֹא נִתְבַּטֵּל לְגַמְרֵי בַּבֵּינוֹנִי, אֶלָּא בַּצַּדִּיק שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בּוֹ: "וְלִבִּי חָלָל בְּקִרְבִּי", וְהוּא מוֹאֵס בָּרַע וְשֹוֹנְאוֹ בְּתַכְלִית הַשִּׂנְאָה וְהַמִּיאוּס, אוֹ שֶׁלֹּא בְּתַכְלִית הַשִּׂנְאָה כַּנִּזְכָּר לְעֵיל.

אֲבָל בַּבֵּינוֹנִי הוּא דֶּרֶךְ מָשָׁל כְּאָדָם שֶׁיָּשֵׁן, שֶׁיָּכוֹל לַחֲזֹר וְלֵעוֹר מִשְׁנָתוֹ, כָּךְ הָרַע בַּבֵּינוֹנִי הוּא כְּיָשֵׁן בֶּחָלָל הַשְּׂמָאלִי בִּשְׁעַת קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע וּתְפִלָה שֶׁלִּבּוֹ בּוֹעֵר בְּאַהֲבַת ה', וְאַחַר כָּךְ יָכוֹל לִהְיוֹת חוֹזֵר וְנֵעוֹר.

Translation

In the beinoni, though, it is not entirely abolished. That is so only with the tzaddik, about whom Scripture says: “My heart is emptied inside me.” He loathes evil and detests it with total hatred and revulsion, or with a hatred that falls short of total, as discussed earlier.

In the beinoni, by way of comparison, it is like a man who is asleep, who can wake up again from his sleep. So the evil in the beinoni is as if asleep in the left chamber during Shema and prayer, when his heart burns with love of G‑d, and afterwards it can wake up again.

Explanation

This is the whole difference. In the tzaddik the evil is gone: “my heart is void within me”. He despises evil, completely, or in the incomplete tzaddik not quite completely, as chapter 10 explained.

In the beinoni it only sleeps. While his heart burns during Shema and the Amidah he feels no craving at all, but a sleeping man has not changed, and after prayer the evil can wake up. Prayer puts the evil to sleep; it does not change it. That is why the beinoni has to pray again every day.

Sources

7.Rabbah, the beinoni who prays all day

וְלָכֵן הָיָה רַבָּה מַחֲזִיק עַצְמוֹ כְּבֵינוֹנִי, אַף דְּלָא פָּסֵק פֻּמֵּהּ מִגִּירְסָא וּבְתוֹרַת ה' חֶפְצוֹ יוֹמָם וָלַיְלָה, בַּחֲפִיצָה וַחֲשִׁיקָה וּתְשׁוּקָה וְנֶפֶשׁ שׁוֹקֵקָה לַה' בְּאַהֲבָה רַבָּה כְּבִשְׁעַת קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע וּתְפִלָּה, וְנִדְמֶה בְּעֵינָיו כְּבֵינוֹנִי הַמִּתְפַּלֵּל כָּל הַיּוֹם, וּכְמַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: הַלְוַאי שֶׁיִּתְפַּלֵּל אָדָם כָּל הַיּוֹם כֻּלּוֹ.

Translation

That is why Rabbah considered himself a beinoni, even though his mouth never stopped from learning, and his desire was in G‑d’s Torah day and night, with longing, yearning and desire, and a soul thirsting for G‑d with great love, as at the time of Shema and prayer. In his own eyes he seemed like a beinoni who prays all day, as our Sages said: “Would that a person pray the whole day long!”

Explanation

This settles a question from chapter 1. Rabbah called himself a beinoni. Yet he was in fact a tzaddik, and surely knew he felt no craving for evil at all. How could he make that mistake?

Because there is an even higher level of beinoni. The burning love others feel only during Shema and the Amidah stayed with Rabbah all day as he learned without a break, so no craving for evil ever reached him. Yet a beinoni who holds on to the state of prayer from morning to night would feel none either, since in him the evil is always asleep. So the absence of desire was no evidence, in Rabbah’s eyes, of being a tzaddik. He could see himself as “a beinoni who prays all day long”, as the Sages wished.

Sources

8.True for him, though not the tzaddik’s truth

וְהִנֵּה מִדַּת אַהֲבָה זוֹ הָאֲמוּרָה בַּבֵּינוֹנִים בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּפִלָּה עַל יְדֵי הִתְגַּבְּרוּת הַנֶּפֶשׁ הָאֱלֹהִית וכו', הִנֵּה לְגַבֵּי מַדְרֵגַת הַצַּדִּיקִים עוֹבְדֵי ה' בֶּאֱמֶת לַאֲמִתּוֹ אֵין בְּחִינַת אַהֲבָה זוֹ נִקְרֵאת בְּשֵׁם עֲבוֹדַת אֱמֶת כְּלָל, מֵאַחַר שֶׁחוֹלֶפֶת וְעוֹבֶרֶת אַחַר הַתְּפִלָּה, וּכְתִיב: "שְׂפַת אֱמֶת תִּכּוֹן לָעַד וְעַד אַרְגִּיעָה לְשׁוֹן שָׁקֶר". וְאַף עַל פִּי כֵן,

לְגַבֵּי מַדְרֵגַת הַבֵּינוֹנִים נִקְרֵאת עֲבוֹדָה תַּמָּה בֶּאֱמֶת לַאֲמִתּוֹ שֶׁלָּהֶם, אִישׁ אִישׁ כְּפִי מַדְרֵגָתוֹ בְּמַדְרֵגַת הַבֵּינוֹנִים, וַהֲרֵינִי קוֹרֵא בְּאַהֲבָתָם שֶׁבִּתְפִלָּתָם גַּם כֵּן "שְׂפַת אֱמֶת תִּכּוֹן לָעַד", הוֹאִיל וּבְכֹחַ נַפְשָׁם הָאֱלֹהִית לַחֲזֹר וּלְעוֹרֵר בְּחִינַת אַהֲבָה זוֹ לְעוֹלָם, בְּהִתְגַּבְּרוּתָהּ בִּשְׁעַת הַתְּפִלָּה מִדֵּי יוֹם בְּיוֹם עַל יְדֵי הֲכָנָה הָרְאוּיָה לְכָל נֶפֶשׁ כְּפִי עֶרְכָּהּ וּמַדְרֵגָתָהּ.

Translation

Now this love we described in beinonim during prayer, the love that arises as the G‑dly soul gathers strength and so on, does not deserve the name “true service” at all when set beside the tzaddikim, who serve G‑d with the deepest truth, because once prayer ends it fades and disappears. And Scripture says: “Truthful lips endure for all time, but a false tongue lasts only an instant.”

Nevertheless, relative to the level of the beinonim it is called “perfect service”, in their own truest truth, each one according to his level among the levels of the beinonim. And I, too, call their love in their prayer “the lip of truth that shall stand forever”, since their G‑dly soul has the power to come back and awaken this love always, when it gains strength at the time of prayer, every single day, through the preparation fitting for each soul according to its worth and level.

Explanation

If the beinoni’s love is gone an hour after prayer, was it real? Truth “stands forever”; what lasts a moment is the mark of falsehood. Next to the tzaddik, whose love never leaves him, it is not called true service at all.

Not because the beinoni fools himself. While he prays, he really loves G‑d; it just does not stay.

Yet on his own level it is perfect, true service, and the Alter Rebbe says so in his own voice: “I call their love ‘the lip of truth’.” The reason: his G‑dly soul always has the power to wake that love again, every day, through the preparation that suits it. So it is not a passing mood but a lasting ability. A higher soul needs less preparation, but every soul can do it.

Sources

9.Truth runs through every level

כִּי הִנֵּה מִדַּת אֱמֶת הִיא מִדָּתוֹ שֶׁל יַעֲקֹב, הַנִּקְרָא בְּרִיחַ הַתִּיכוֹן הַמַּבְרִיחַ מִן הַקָּצֶה אֶל הַקָּצֶה, מֵרוֹם הַמַּעֲלוֹת וּמַדְרֵגוֹת עַד סוֹף כָּל דַּרְגִּין, וּבְכָל מַעֲלָה וּמַדְרֵגָה מַבְרִיחַ תּוֹךְ נְקֻדָּה הָאֶמְצָעִית, שֶׁהִיא נְקֻדַּת וּבְחִינַת מִדַּת אֱמֶת שֶׁלָּהּ.

וּמִדַּת אֱמֶת הִיא נַחֲלָה בְּלִי מְצָרִים, וְאֵין לָהּ שִׁעוּר לְמַעְלָה עַד רוֹם הַמַּעֲלוֹת. וְכָל מַעֲלוֹת וּמַדְרֵגוֹת שֶׁלְּמַטָּה הֵם כְּאַיִן לְגַבֵּי מַעֲלוֹת וּמַדְרֵגוֹת שֶׁלְּמַעְלָה מֵהֶן, [כַּיָּדוּעַ לְיוֹדְעֵי חֵ"ן שֶׁבְּחִינַת רֹאשׁ וּמוֹחִין שֶׁל מַדְרֵגוֹת תַּחְתּוֹנוֹת הֵן לְמַטָּה מִבְּחִינַת עֲקֵבַיִם וְרַגְלֵי מַדְרֵגוֹת עֶלְיוֹנוֹת מֵהֶן, וּכְמַאֲמַר רַזַ"ל: "רַגְלֵי הַחַיּוֹת כְּנֶגֶד כֻּלָּן"].

Translation

For truth is Yaakov’s attribute, and he is called “the central beam that passes from one end to the other”: from the loftiest heights and ranks down to the lowest of all ranks. At each height and rank it passes through the midpoint, which is the core and quality of truth at that rank.

The attribute of truth is “an inheritance without boundaries”. It has no limit upward, to the highest of heights, and all the heights and levels below are as nothing compared with the heights and levels above them. [As is known to those who know the Kabbalah, the “head” and “mind” of lower levels are beneath the “heels” and “feet” of the levels above them, as our Sages said: “The feet of the Chayos are equal to all of them.”]

Explanation

How can the same love be untrue next to the tzaddik and true for the beinoni? Is truth not absolute?

Think of the Mishkan. Its upright boards were held together by a middle bar running through the center of every board, end to end. Truth is that bar. It passes through every level, from highest to lowest, and in each it runs through that level’s core. A thing is true when it matches the core of its own level.

And truth has no ceiling: the top of a lower level is beneath the bottom of the next. So the beinoni’s love is real truth on his level, and as nothing next to the tzaddik’s. Both hold.

Sources

The Yesod: Honest about the heart, faithful in the deed

Chapter 1 opened with an oath that seemed impossible to keep: be a tzaddik, and even if the whole world calls you a tzaddik, see yourself as a rasha. How can a person be told to think himself wicked, when the Mishnah forbids it and it leads to sadness? Chapter 13 closes the loop with one word: kerasha, “like” a rasha. (The first half, “be a tzaddik”, comes in the next chapter.)

The beinoni is two things at once. In what he does, he is like the tzaddik: never a sin in thought, speech or action. In what he is, he is like the rasha: the same animal soul, the same cravings, at full strength, even after years of Torah and prayer. The oath asks him to hold both truths and let neither swallow the other.

Knowing the evil is still there protects him twice. He will not believe the world: people see clean behavior and decide the struggle is over, and if he believed them he would stop guarding and could fall a long way. And he will not despair: an ugly desire that suddenly wakes is no proof of failure, only the animal soul doing what it does, and it does not stop him for a moment from living as a Jew should. So the oath does not lead to sadness. It leads to calm, honest self-knowledge, free of both pride and gloom.

And his avodah is real. His love of G‑d fades after prayer and is as nothing next to the tzaddik’s, yet on his level it is truth, because he wakes it again every day. Truth runs through every level like the Mishkan’s middle bar, and his daily, sincere effort is his point of truth.

This is why the beinoni is the hero of the Tanya. The tzaddik’s level belongs to a few; the next chapter will say that the beinoni is a level within every person’s reach. That is what the oath asks: know exactly who you are, and serve G‑d anyway, every day.

Sources

Points to ponder

  1. Where has other people’s praise convinced me that a struggle is over, so that I quietly stopped guarding?
  2. When an ugly desire wakes after a good stretch, do I read it as failure, or as the animal soul waking from sleep?
  3. What do I do each day, in prayer or before it, that puts the evil to sleep and lights up the hours after?
  4. Is my love of G‑d a mood that comes by chance, or something I can wake again tomorrow through preparation?
  5. Can I hold both truths at once: my deeds can be clean, and my heart is still a beinoni’s heart?